PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FFN.TO vs. DGS.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FFN.TODGS.TO
YTD Return86.40%62.90%
1Y Return180.56%88.87%
3Y Return (Ann)8.47%14.59%
5Y Return (Ann)11.67%19.92%
10Y Return (Ann)2.42%11.00%
Sharpe Ratio4.644.39
Sortino Ratio5.535.36
Omega Ratio1.771.75
Calmar Ratio2.343.02
Martin Ratio41.2144.28
Ulcer Index4.36%2.03%
Daily Std Dev38.68%20.45%
Max Drawdown-90.56%-85.18%
Current Drawdown-34.74%0.00%

Fundamentals


FFN.TODGS.TO
Market CapCA$370.77MCA$306.36M
EPSCA$2.87CA$1.30
PE Ratio2.445.46
PEG Ratio0.000.00
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$99.76MCA$43.36M
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$93.41MCA$38.91M
EBITDA (TTM)CA$184.10MCA$80.79M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between FFN.TO and DGS.TO is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FFN.TO vs. DGS.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FFN.TO achieves a 86.40% return, which is significantly higher than DGS.TO's 62.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FFN.TO has underperformed DGS.TO with an annualized return of 2.42%, while DGS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.00% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
29.11%
24.79%
FFN.TO
DGS.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFN.TO vs. DGS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North American Financial 15 Split Corp. (FFN.TO) and Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFN.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FFN.TO, currently valued at 4.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.34
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FFN.TO, currently valued at 5.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.005.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FFN.TO, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.72
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFN.TO, currently valued at 2.25, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FFN.TO, currently valued at 38.71, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0038.71
DGS.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DGS.TO, currently valued at 3.85, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for DGS.TO, currently valued at 4.75, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.75
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for DGS.TO, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.65
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for DGS.TO, currently valued at 2.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.44
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for DGS.TO, currently valued at 37.20, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0037.20

FFN.TO vs. DGS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.64, which is comparable to the DGS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFN.TO and DGS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.34
3.85
FFN.TO
DGS.TO

Dividends

FFN.TO vs. DGS.TO - Dividend Comparison

FFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.94%, less than DGS.TO's 15.49% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FFN.TO
North American Financial 15 Split Corp.
12.94%5.14%13.43%18.28%6.65%7,609,030.01%11,701,163.86%6,470,486.85%3,608,540.74%6,677,726.64%6,966,984.60%4,977,297.57%
DGS.TO
Dividend Growth Split Corp.
15.49%5.86%17.42%14.68%5.88%15.18%24.93%14.85%15.33%17.91%13.11%11.82%

Drawdowns

FFN.TO vs. DGS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFN.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.56%, which is greater than DGS.TO's maximum drawdown of -85.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFN.TO and DGS.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-40.66%
-0.95%
FFN.TO
DGS.TO

Volatility

FFN.TO vs. DGS.TO - Volatility Comparison

North American Financial 15 Split Corp. (FFN.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO) at 4.79%. This indicates that FFN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.81%
4.79%
FFN.TO
DGS.TO

Financials

FFN.TO vs. DGS.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between North American Financial 15 Split Corp. and Dividend Growth Split Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items