URB.TO vs. 0011.HK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

URB.TO (Urbana Corporation) and 0011.HK (Hang Seng Bank) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — URB.TO in Asset Management, 0011.HK in Banks - Regional. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

URB.TO vs. 0011.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Urbana Corporation (URB.TO) and Hang Seng Bank (0011.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

URB.TO is traded in CAD, while 0011.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 0011.HK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

URB.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: -3.28%
• 6M: 8.58%
• 1Y: 47.67%
• 3Y*: 35.02%
• 5Y*: 24.98%
• 10Y*: 19.05%

0011.HK

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URB.TO vs. 0011.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
URB.TO Urbana Corporation	-3.28%	71.25%	25.08%	14.21%	18.74%	31.08%	4.05%	18.08%	-27.20%	23.60%
0011.HK Hang Seng Bank	-0.82%	62.65%	23.12%	-28.08%	0.16%	9.50%	-14.06%	-8.68%	1.59%	29.79%

Correlation

The correlation between URB.TO and 0011.HK is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2009	-0.00

Return for Risk

URB.TO vs. 0011.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URB.TO

URB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 83
URB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
URB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
URB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
URB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
URB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URB.TO vs. 0011.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Urbana Corporation (URB.TO) and Hang Seng Bank (0011.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URB.TO	0011.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.45	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URB.TO	0011.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	URB.TO	0011.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.64%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.32%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.69%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	URB.TO	0011.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.27%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.35%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.71%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.49%	—	—

Dividends

URB.TO vs. 0011.HK - Dividend Comparison

URB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than 0011.HK's 1.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
0011.HK Hang Seng Bank	1.69%	4.63%	7.12%	5.82%	3.00%	4.27%	5.01%	4.84%	3.98%	3.30%	4.37%	3.80%
URB.TO Urbana Corporation	1.51%	1.34%	2.07%	2.32%	2.35%	2.44%	2.76%	2.44%	4.00%	2.83%	1.69%	2.44%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URB.TO and 0011.HK in my portfolio?

URB.TO and 0011.HK have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.