URAN vs. RBIL

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

URAN (Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URAN is a Uranium fund tracking the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, URAN returned -0.25% vs 3.94% for RBIL. Their -0.19 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. URAN charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

URAN vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URAN achieves a -12.41% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.70% return.

URAN

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -4.79%
• 6M: -26.75%
• YTD: -12.41%
• 1Y: -0.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.93%

RBIL

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.26%
• 6M: 2.32%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	$1.12M	$1.89M	$2.34M
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	$140.10K	$486.39K	$433.21K

URAN vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	-12.41%	46.32%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.70%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between URAN and RBIL is -0.23, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.19

Return for Risk

URAN vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

URAN

URAN Risk / Return Rank: 11
URAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
URAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
URAN Omega Ratio Rank: 12
URAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
URAN Martin Ratio Rank: 10

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

URAN vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	URAN	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	4.23	-4.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.22	6.54	-6.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	2.09	-1.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	7.24	-7.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.11	29.66	-29.77

URAN vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URAN Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URAN and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

URAN vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URAN drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URAN and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	URAN	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.21%	-0.56%	-34.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.21%	-0.56%	-34.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.51%	-0.13%	-33.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.37%	-0.08%	-12.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.37%	0.14%	+17.23%

Volatility

URAN vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) has a higher volatility of 9.49% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.31%. This indicates that URAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URAN	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.49%	0.31%	+9.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.24%	0.89%	+28.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.04%	0.97%	+39.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.93%	1.06%	+37.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.93%	1.06%	+37.87%

URAN vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

URAN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

URAN vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

URAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than RBIL's 4.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.16%	3.65%	0.00%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	2.93%	2.56%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URAN and RBIL in my portfolio?

URAN and RBIL have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URAN or RBIL?

URAN has higher volatility (9.49%) compared to RBIL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URAN dropped -35.21% vs RBIL's -0.56%.

Which ETF is better, URAN or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 3.94% vs -0.25% for URAN. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URAN or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 3.94% return vs -0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URAN or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for URAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URAN or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 2.93% for URAN.

What is the main difference between URAN and RBIL?

URAN is categorized as Uranium, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. URAN tracks BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for URAN and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.