URAN vs. NUKZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

URAN (Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF) and NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URAN is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index, while NUKZ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, URAN returned 28.74% vs 41.42% for NUKZ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. URAN charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for NUKZ.

Performance

URAN vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URAN achieves a 5.17% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 13.31% return.

URAN

• 1D: -3.96%
• 1M: -5.96%
• YTD: 5.17%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: 28.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NUKZ

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 13.31%
• 6M: 10.66%
• 1Y: 41.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URAN vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	5.17%	49.05%	4.09%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	13.31%	56.57%	11.54%

Correlation

The correlation between URAN and NUKZ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	0.89

The correlation between URAN and NUKZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

URAN vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URAN

URAN Risk / Return Rank: 22
URAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
URAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
URAN Omega Ratio Rank: 21
URAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
URAN Martin Ratio Rank: 20

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 40
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 34
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URAN vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URAN	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	1.40	-0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	2.02	-0.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.23	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	2.52	-1.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.27	6.34	-4.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URAN vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URAN Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URAN and NUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URAN	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73	1.40	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.75	-0.89

Drawdowns

URAN vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URAN drawdown since its inception was -31.96%, roughly equal to the maximum NUKZ drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URAN and NUKZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	URAN	NUKZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.96%	-33.03%	+1.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.31%	-16.51%	-8.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.16%	-5.61%	-14.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.75%	-6.01%	-4.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.71%	6.55%	+6.16%

Volatility

URAN vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 10.30%. This indicates that URAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URAN	NUKZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.29%	10.30%	+1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.33%	22.05%	+7.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.47%	29.74%	+9.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.13%	32.70%	+6.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.13%	32.70%	+6.43%

URAN vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

URAN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

URAN vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

URAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than NUKZ's 0.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.80%	0.91%	0.09%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	2.44%	2.56%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URAN and NUKZ in my portfolio?

URAN and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URAN or NUKZ?

URAN has higher volatility (12.29%) compared to NUKZ (10.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URAN dropped -31.96% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.

Which ETF is better, URAN or NUKZ?

On 1-year performance, NUKZ leads with 41.42% vs 28.74% for URAN. On fees, URAN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NUKZ has been the lower-risk option at 10.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URAN or NUKZ?

Over the 1-year period, NUKZ has performed better with a 41.42% return vs 28.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URAN or NUKZ?

URAN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URAN or NUKZ?

URAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 0.80% for NUKZ.

What is the main difference between URAN and NUKZ?

URAN is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while NUKZ is Energy Equities. URAN tracks BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index, while NUKZ tracks Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for URAN and 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.