URAN vs. ICOP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

URAN (Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF) and ICOP (iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds - URAN tracks the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index while ICOP tracks the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, URAN returned 28.74% vs 102.60% for ICOP. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. URAN charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for ICOP.

Performance

URAN vs. ICOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) and iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URAN achieves a 5.17% return, which is significantly lower than ICOP's 27.29% return.

URAN

• 1D: -3.96%
• 1M: -5.96%
• YTD: 5.17%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: 28.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ICOP

• 1D: -3.29%
• 1M: 17.09%
• YTD: 27.29%
• 6M: 37.08%
• 1Y: 102.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URAN vs. ICOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	5.17%	49.05%	4.09%
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF	27.29%	78.01%	-17.61%

Correlation

The correlation between URAN and ICOP is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	0.54

The correlation between URAN and ICOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

URAN vs. ICOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URAN

URAN Risk / Return Rank: 22
URAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
URAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
URAN Omega Ratio Rank: 21
URAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
URAN Martin Ratio Rank: 20

ICOP

ICOP Risk / Return Rank: 74
ICOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ICOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ICOP Omega Ratio Rank: 68
ICOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
ICOP Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URAN vs. ICOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) and iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URAN	ICOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	2.77	-2.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	3.11	-1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.42	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	3.95	-2.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.27	14.50	-12.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URAN vs. ICOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URAN Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the ICOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URAN and ICOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URAN	ICOP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73	2.77	-2.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.08	-0.21

Drawdowns

URAN vs. ICOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URAN drawdown since its inception was -31.96%, smaller than the maximum ICOP drawdown of -38.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URAN and ICOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	URAN	ICOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.96%	-38.67%	+6.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.31%	-26.13%	+0.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.16%	-3.29%	-16.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.75%	-11.67%	+0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.71%	7.10%	+5.61%

Volatility

URAN vs. ICOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) is 12.29%, while iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) has a volatility of 13.69%. This indicates that URAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URAN	ICOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.29%	13.69%	-1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.33%	32.28%	-2.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.47%	37.29%	+2.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.13%	33.77%	+5.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.13%	33.77%	+5.36%

URAN vs. ICOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

URAN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOP's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

URAN vs. ICOP - Dividend Comparison

URAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than ICOP's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF	1.63%	2.08%	1.87%	2.15%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	2.44%	2.56%	0.21%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URAN and ICOP in my portfolio?

URAN and ICOP have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URAN or ICOP?

ICOP has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to URAN (12.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URAN dropped -31.96% vs ICOP's -38.67%.

Which ETF is better, URAN or ICOP?

On 1-year performance, ICOP leads with 102.60% vs 28.74% for URAN. On fees, URAN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, URAN has been the lower-risk option at 12.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URAN or ICOP?

Over the 1-year period, ICOP has performed better with a 102.60% return vs 28.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URAN or ICOP?

URAN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for ICOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URAN or ICOP?

URAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 1.63% for ICOP.

What is the main difference between URAN and ICOP?

URAN tracks BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index, while ICOP tracks STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for URAN and 0.47% for ICOP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.