URAN vs. BIL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

URAN (Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URAN is a Uranium fund tracking the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, URAN returned 14.67% vs 3.85% for BIL. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. URAN charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.

Performance

URAN vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URAN achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.66% return.

URAN

• 1D: -2.23%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: -2.15%
• 6M: -4.70%
• 1Y: 14.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 3.85%
• 3Y*: 4.60%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: 2.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URAN vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	-2.15%	49.05%	3.89%
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	1.66%	4.15%	1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between URAN and BIL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	-0.06

Return for Risk

URAN vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URAN

URAN Risk / Return Rank: 14
URAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
URAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
URAN Omega Ratio Rank: 14
URAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
URAN Martin Ratio Rank: 13

BIL

BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URAN vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	URAN	BIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	19.37	-19.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	173.17	-172.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	87.41	-86.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	353.28	-352.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.05	2,801.35	-2,800.30

URAN vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URAN Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URAN and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

URAN vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URAN drawdown since its inception was -31.96%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URAN and BIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	URAN	BIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.96%	-0.78%	-31.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.02%	-0.01%	-31.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.09%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-0.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.72%	0.00%	-25.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.16%	-0.26%	-10.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.96%	0.00%	+13.96%

Volatility

URAN vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) has a higher volatility of 13.39% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that URAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URAN	BIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.39%	0.07%	+13.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.45%	0.14%	+30.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.70%	0.20%	+39.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.43%	0.26%	+39.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.43%	0.26%	+39.17%

URAN vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

URAN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

URAN vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

URAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than BIL's 3.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	3.85%	4.13%	5.03%	4.92%	1.35%	0.00%	0.30%	2.05%	1.66%	0.68%	0.07%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	2.62%	2.56%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URAN and BIL in my portfolio?

URAN and BIL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URAN or BIL?

URAN has higher volatility (13.39%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URAN dropped -31.96% vs BIL's -0.78%.

Which ETF is better, URAN or BIL?

On 1-year performance, URAN leads with 14.67% vs 3.85% for BIL. On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URAN or BIL?

Over the 1-year period, URAN has performed better with a 14.67% return vs 3.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URAN or BIL?

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for URAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URAN or BIL?

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 2.62% for URAN.

What is the main difference between URAN and BIL?

URAN is categorized as Uranium, while BIL is Government Bonds. URAN tracks BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for URAN and 0.14% for BIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.37 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.