PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URA vs. UTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URA vs. UTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly lower than UTG's 17.89% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has outperformed UTG with an annualized return of 16.35%, while UTG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.66% annualized return.


URA

1D
1.44%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
11.82%
6M
9.09%
1Y
36.15%
3Y*
34.26%
5Y*
22.77%
10Y*
16.35%

UTG

1D
2.23%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
17.89%
6M
20.01%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URA vs. UTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
11.82%67.18%-0.58%46.25%-11.32%57.57%41.33%-3.54%-22.11%19.36%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
17.89%23.24%28.10%2.84%-13.38%14.26%-5.25%33.65%1.84%6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between URA and UTG is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010

0.31

The correlation between URA and UTG shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URA vs. UTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

UTG
UTG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
UTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
UTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URA vs. UTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URAUTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.29

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

2.52

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.26

5.48

-3.21

URA vs. UTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URA Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the UTG Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URA and UTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URA vs. UTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than UTG's maximum drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and UTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URAUTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.54%

-67.77%

-25.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.48%

-11.59%

-19.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.81%

-15.03%

-22.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.90%

-26.54%

-11.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.45%

-47.91%

-13.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.78%

-2.65%

-43.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.91%

-8.73%

-66.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.41%

5.33%

+9.08%

Volatility

URA vs. UTG - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 17.77% compared to Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) at 6.16%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URAUTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.77%

6.16%

+11.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.65%

13.51%

+26.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.29%

17.27%

+34.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.88%

16.94%

+26.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.94%

21.63%

+16.31%

Dividends

URA vs. UTG - Dividend Comparison

URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than UTG's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
4.36%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
5.70%6.42%7.19%8.53%8.07%6.35%6.59%5.69%6.86%6.21%9.02%6.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


URA and UTG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URA has higher volatility (17.77%) compared to UTG (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs UTG's -67.77%.

UTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URA and UTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer