PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URA vs. URNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

URA vs. URNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

URA vs. URNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
13.34%67.18%-0.58%26.85%
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
16.23%45.35%-18.34%19.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 13.34% return, which is significantly lower than URNJ's 16.23% return.


URA

1D
6.93%
1M
-10.88%
YTD
13.34%
6M
6.44%
1Y
121.39%
3Y*
40.54%
5Y*
24.65%
10Y*
16.47%

URNJ

1D
9.99%
1M
-15.88%
YTD
16.23%
6M
7.68%
1Y
118.59%
3Y*
29.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


URA vs. URNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than URNJ's 0.80% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

URA vs. URNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

URNJ
URNJ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
URNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
URNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URA vs. URNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URAURNJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

1.88

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.97

2.49

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.30

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

3.55

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.13

8.73

+1.40

URA vs. URNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URA Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the URNJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URA and URNJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URAURNJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

1.88

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.33

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between URA and URNJ is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

URA vs. URNJ - Dividend Comparison

URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than URNJ's 5.66% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
4.30%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
5.66%6.58%4.33%4.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

URA vs. URNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than URNJ's maximum drawdown of -59.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and URNJ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


URAURNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.54%

-59.21%

-34.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.43%

-34.13%

+5.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.04%

-27.55%

-17.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.40%

-20.92%

-54.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.82%

13.87%

-2.05%

Volatility

URA vs. URNJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is 16.31%, while Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) has a volatility of 20.63%. This indicates that URA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


URAURNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.31%

20.63%

-4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.54%

47.79%

-9.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.21%

63.33%

-14.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.00%

53.24%

-10.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.23%

53.24%

-16.01%