PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URA vs. UNH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URA vs. UNH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly lower than UNH's 23.11% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has outperformed UNH with an annualized return of 16.35%, while UNH has yielded a comparatively lower 13.06% annualized return.


URA

1D
1.44%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
11.82%
6M
9.09%
1Y
36.15%
3Y*
34.26%
5Y*
22.77%
10Y*
16.35%

UNH

1D
0.36%
1M
3.80%
YTD
23.11%
6M
24.12%
1Y
36.32%
3Y*
-2.42%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
13.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URA vs. UNH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
11.82%67.18%-0.58%46.25%-11.32%57.57%41.33%-3.54%-22.11%19.36%
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
23.11%-33.14%-2.41%0.80%6.94%45.20%21.25%20.00%14.52%39.83%

Correlation

The correlation between URA and UNH is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010

0.23

The correlation between URA and UNH shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URA vs. UNH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

UNH
UNH Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
UNH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNH Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
UNH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNH Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URA vs. UNH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URAUNHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.20

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.18

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.26

2.59

-0.32

URA vs. UNH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URA Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the UNH Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URA and UNH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URA vs. UNH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than UNH's maximum drawdown of -74.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and UNH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URAUNHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.54%

-74.37%

-19.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.48%

-28.96%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.81%

-61.39%

+23.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.90%

-61.39%

+23.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.45%

-61.39%

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.78%

-33.15%

-12.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.91%

-14.78%

-60.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.41%

13.17%

+1.24%

Volatility

URA vs. UNH - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 17.77% compared to UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) at 7.81%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URAUNHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.77%

7.81%

+9.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.65%

30.77%

+8.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.29%

40.05%

+11.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.88%

31.89%

+11.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.94%

30.19%

+7.75%

Dividends

URA vs. UNH - Dividend Comparison

URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than UNH's 2.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
2.23%2.64%1.62%1.38%1.21%1.12%1.38%1.41%1.38%1.30%1.48%1.59%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
4.36%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


URA and UNH have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URA has higher volatility (17.77%) compared to UNH (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs UNH's -74.37%.

UNH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URA and UNH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer