URA vs. NRG

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

URA (Global X Uranium ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while NRG (NRG Energy, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, URA returned 15.90%/yr vs 26.90%/yr for NRG. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

URA vs. NRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly higher than NRG's -20.72% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has underperformed NRG with an annualized return of 15.90%, while NRG has yielded a comparatively higher 26.90% annualized return.

URA

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -14.61%
• YTD: 6.53%
• 6M: 3.57%
• 1Y: 32.44%
• 3Y*: 32.17%
• 5Y*: 18.77%
• 10Y*: 15.90%

NRG

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: -20.72%
• 6M: -21.80%
• 1Y: -15.96%
• 3Y*: 57.21%
• 5Y*: 30.96%
• 10Y*: 26.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URA vs. NRG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
URA Global X Uranium ETF	6.53%	67.18%	-0.58%	46.25%	-11.32%	57.57%	41.33%	-3.54%	-22.11%	19.36%
NRG NRG Energy, Inc.	-20.72%	78.91%	78.58%	69.36%	-23.47%	18.54%	-2.14%	0.69%	39.59%	133.69%

Correlation

The correlation between URA and NRG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010	0.32

Return for Risk

URA vs. NRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 23
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 23
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 21

NRG

NRG Risk / Return Rank: 25
NRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
NRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
NRG Omega Ratio Rank: 27
NRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
NRG Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URA vs. NRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	URA	NRG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	-0.36	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	-0.22	+1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	0.97	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.04	-0.47	+1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.30	-1.16	+3.47

URA vs. NRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URA Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the NRG Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URA and NRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

URA vs. NRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than NRG's maximum drawdown of -79.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and NRG.

Drawdown Indicators

	URA	NRG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.54%	-79.41%	-14.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.48%	-34.24%	+2.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.81%	-34.24%	-3.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.90%	-34.24%	-3.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.45%	-48.76%	-12.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.34%	-31.61%	-16.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.94%	-27.99%	-46.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.12%	13.73%	+0.39%

Volatility

URA vs. NRG - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 17.69% compared to NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) at 15.26%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URA	NRG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.69%	15.26%	+2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.95%	35.10%	+4.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.24%	44.88%	+6.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.96%	40.03%	+3.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.91%	39.16%	-1.25%

Dividends

URA vs. NRG - Dividend Comparison

URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than NRG's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NRG NRG Energy, Inc.	1.46%	1.11%	1.81%	2.92%	4.40%	3.02%	3.20%	0.30%	0.30%	0.42%	1.92%	4.93%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.58%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URA and NRG in my portfolio?

URA and NRG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URA or NRG?

URA has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to NRG (15.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs NRG's -79.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.