PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URA vs. NGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URA vs. NGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and New Gold Inc. (NGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


URA

1D
1.54%
1M
-14.61%
YTD
6.53%
6M
3.57%
1Y
32.44%
3Y*
32.17%
5Y*
18.77%
10Y*
15.90%

NGD

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URA vs. NGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
6.53%67.18%-0.58%46.25%-11.32%57.57%41.33%-3.54%-22.11%19.36%
NGD
New Gold Inc.
4.25%251.21%69.86%48.98%-34.67%-31.51%148.86%16.28%-77.00%-6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between URA and NGD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URA vs. NGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

NGD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URA vs. NGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and New Gold Inc. (NGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URANGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.30

URA vs. NGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URA vs. NGD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URANGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.12%

Volatility

URA vs. NGD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URANGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.91%

Dividends

URA vs. NGD - Dividend Comparison

URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, while NGD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NGD
New Gold Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
4.58%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


URA and NGD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URA and NGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer