URA vs. LVHI
URA (Global X Uranium ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, URA returned 21.19%/yr vs 15.66%/yr for LVHI. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
URA vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with URA having a 12.47% return and LVHI slightly higher at 13.06%.
URA
- 1D
- 5.58%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 39.37%
- 3Y*
- 34.52%
- 5Y*
- 21.19%
- 10Y*
- 16.50%
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 13.06%
- 6M
- 13.70%
- 1Y
- 31.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 15.66%
- 10Y*
- —
URA vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 12.47% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | -3.54% | -22.11% | 19.36% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.06% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between URA and LVHI is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.37 |
The correlation between URA and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
URA vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
URA
LVHI
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
URA
LVHI
Industrials
URA
LVHI
Utilities
URA
LVHI
Basic Materials
URA
LVHI
Technology
URA
LVHI
Communication Services
URA
-
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
URA
-
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
URA
-
LVHI
Financial Services
URA
-
LVHI
Healthcare
URA
-
LVHI
Real Estate
URA
-
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URA vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
URA
LVHI
URA vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URA | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.62 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 5.17 | -3.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | 21.39 | -18.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URA vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URA | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.54% | -32.31% | -61.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.48% | -6.08% | -25.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.81% | -11.99% | -25.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.90% | -11.99% | -25.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.46% | -0.63% | -44.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.93% | -3.51% | -71.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.19% | 1.47% | +12.72% |
Volatility
URA vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 18.71% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.83%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URA | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.71% | 2.83% | +15.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.22% | 7.76% | +32.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.62% | 9.63% | +41.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.93% | 11.09% | +32.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.95% | 13.75% | +24.20% |
URA vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
URA vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than LVHI's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.72% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.34% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URA and LVHI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (18.71%) compared to LVHI (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, URA leads with 21.19% vs 15.66% for LVHI. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, URA has performed better with a 21.19% return vs 15.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.34% for URA.
URA is categorized as Uranium, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for URA and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URA and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer