URA vs. IXJ

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

URA (Global X Uranium ETF) and IXJ (iShares Global Healthcare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while IXJ is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Healthcare Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, URA returned 15.90%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for IXJ. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXJ.

Performance

URA vs. IXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly higher than IXJ's -1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has outperformed IXJ with an annualized return of 15.90%, while IXJ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.43% annualized return.

URA

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -13.30%
• YTD: 6.53%
• 6M: 3.57%
• 1Y: 32.00%
• 3Y*: 32.17%
• 5Y*: 18.77%
• 10Y*: 15.90%

IXJ

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 3.58%
• YTD: -1.18%
• 6M: -0.09%
• 1Y: 11.25%
• 3Y*: 5.65%
• 5Y*: 4.37%
• 10Y*: 8.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URA vs. IXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
URA Global X Uranium ETF	6.53%	67.18%	-0.58%	46.25%	-11.32%	57.57%	41.33%	-3.54%	-22.11%	19.36%
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF	-1.18%	14.99%	0.55%	3.62%	-4.94%	19.60%	12.74%	23.23%	2.83%	20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between URA and IXJ is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010	0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between URA and IXJ has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

URA vs. IXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	URA	IXJ
Energy	64.2%	-
Industrials	22.7%	-
Utilities	7.4%	-
Basic Materials	4.8%	-
Technology	0.9%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	98.9%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

URA vs. IXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 23
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 23
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 21

IXJ

IXJ Risk / Return Rank: 22
IXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
IXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
IXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 21
IXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
IXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URA vs. IXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	URA	IXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	0.69	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	1.14	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.13	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.04	0.95	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.30	2.29	+0.02

URA vs. IXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URA Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the IXJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URA and IXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

URA vs. IXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than IXJ's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and IXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	URA	IXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.54%	-40.60%	-52.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.48%	-10.78%	-20.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.81%	-18.14%	-19.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.90%	-18.14%	-19.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.45%	-27.35%	-34.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.34%	-5.37%	-42.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.94%	-6.92%	-68.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.12%	4.52%	+9.60%

Volatility

URA vs. IXJ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 17.69% compared to iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) at 4.81%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URA	IXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.69%	4.81%	+12.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.95%	10.46%	+29.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.24%	14.92%	+36.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.96%	14.26%	+29.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.91%	15.70%	+22.21%

URA vs. IXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than IXJ's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

URA vs. IXJ - Dividend Comparison

URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than IXJ's 1.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF	1.41%	1.40%	1.50%	1.38%	1.17%	1.12%	1.27%	1.42%	2.11%	1.46%	1.73%	2.85%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.58%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URA and IXJ in my portfolio?

URA and IXJ have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URA or IXJ?

URA has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to IXJ (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs IXJ's -40.60%.

Which ETF is better, URA or IXJ?

On 10-year performance, URA leads with 15.90% vs 8.43% for IXJ. On fees, IXJ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URA or IXJ?

Over the 10-year period, URA has performed better with a 15.90% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URA or IXJ?

IXJ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URA or IXJ?

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 1.41% for IXJ.

What is the main difference between URA and IXJ?

URA is categorized as Uranium, while IXJ is Health & Biotech Equities. URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while IXJ tracks S&P Global Healthcare Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for URA and 0.46% for IXJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.