IXJ vs. IHI
IXJ (iShares Global Healthcare ETF) and IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from iShares - IXJ tracks the S&P Global 1200 Health Care (Sector) Capped Index while IHI tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXJ returned 8.54%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for IHI. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXJ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IHI.
Performance
IXJ vs. IHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXJ achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly higher than IHI's -20.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IXJ having a 8.54% annualized return and IHI not far ahead at 8.88%.
IXJ
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- -1.76%
- 6M
- -1.97%
- 1Y
- 13.71%
- 3Y*
- 5.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
IHI
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -2.72%
- YTD
- -20.78%
- 6M
- -21.40%
- 1Y
- -18.62%
- 3Y*
- -3.57%
- 5Y*
- -3.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
IXJ vs. IHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF | -1.76% | 14.99% | 0.55% | 3.62% | -4.94% | 19.60% | 12.74% | 23.23% | 2.83% | 20.44% |
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -20.78% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 32.75% | 15.45% | 30.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXJ and IHI is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IXJ and IHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IXJ vs. IHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXJ
IHI
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IXJ
IHI
Consumer Defensive
IXJ
IHI
-
Basic Materials
IXJ
-
IHI
-
Communication Services
IXJ
-
IHI
-
Consumer Cyclical
IXJ
-
IHI
-
Energy
IXJ
-
IHI
-
Financial Services
IXJ
-
IHI
-
Industrials
IXJ
-
IHI
Real Estate
IXJ
-
IHI
-
Technology
IXJ
-
IHI
-
Utilities
IXJ
-
IHI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXJ vs. IHI — Risk / Return Rank
IXJ
IHI
IXJ vs. IHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) and iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXJ | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.84 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | -0.72 | +1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | -1.63 | +4.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXJ vs. IHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXJ drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum IHI drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXJ and IHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXJ | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -49.65% | +9.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.78% | -26.11% | +15.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -26.64% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | -33.12% | +14.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.35% | -33.25% | +5.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.93% | -25.20% | +19.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.92% | -8.36% | +1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.56% | 11.44% | -6.88% |
Volatility
IXJ vs. IHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) is 5.06%, while iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that IXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXJ | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 6.75% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 13.82% | -3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.87% | 17.62% | -2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.28% | 19.09% | -4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.67% | 19.82% | -4.15% |
IXJ vs. IHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IHI's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXJ vs. IHI - Dividend Comparison
IXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than IHI's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.49% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF | 1.52% | 1.40% | 1.50% | 1.38% | 1.17% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.42% | 2.11% | 1.46% | 1.73% | 2.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXJ and IHI have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHI has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to IXJ (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXJ dropped -40.60% vs IHI's -49.65%.
On 10-year performance, IHI leads with 8.88% vs 8.54% for IXJ. On fees, IHI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IXJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IHI has performed better with a 8.88% return vs 8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXJ.
IXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.49% for IHI.
IXJ tracks S&P Global 1200 Health Care (Sector) Capped Index, while IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IXJ and 0.38% for IHI.
IXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXJ and IHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer