URA vs. COPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

URA (Global X Uranium ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, URA returned 17.12%/yr vs 21.95%/yr for COPX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. URA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.

Performance

URA vs. COPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 17.93% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 25.71% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of 17.12%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.95% annualized return.

URA

• 1D: -5.67%
• 1M: -8.00%
• YTD: 17.93%
• 6M: 13.25%
• 1Y: 61.26%
• 3Y*: 39.27%
• 5Y*: 21.39%
• 10Y*: 17.12%

COPX

• 1D: -3.64%
• 1M: 17.74%
• YTD: 25.71%
• 6M: 36.90%
• 1Y: 120.82%
• 3Y*: 37.36%
• 5Y*: 19.87%
• 10Y*: 21.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URA vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
URA Global X Uranium ETF	17.93%	67.18%	-0.58%	46.25%	-11.32%	57.57%	41.33%	-3.54%	-22.11%	19.36%
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF	25.71%	93.50%	3.57%	8.38%	-0.76%	23.39%	51.66%	12.48%	-31.31%	38.92%

Correlation

The correlation between URA and COPX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2010	0.60

The correlation between URA and COPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

URA vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	URA	COPX
Energy	57.0%	-
Industrials	21.9%	3.7%
Utilities	9.4%	-
Basic Materials	5.0%	96.3%
Technology	0.9%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

URA vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 34
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 31
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 30

COPX

COPX Risk / Return Rank: 75
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URA vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URA	COPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	2.93	-1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	3.17	-1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.42	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	4.37	-2.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.58	14.00	-9.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URA vs. COPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URA Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the COPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URA and COPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URA	COPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	2.93	-1.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.55	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.62	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	0.19	-0.24

Drawdowns

URA vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than COPX's maximum drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and COPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	URA	COPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.54%	-83.16%	-10.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.43%	-27.82%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.81%	-39.72%	+1.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.90%	-42.12%	+4.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.45%	-65.41%	+3.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.81%	-5.69%	-37.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.01%	-39.30%	-35.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.40%	8.66%	+4.74%

Volatility

URA vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) have volatilities of 15.94% and 15.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URA	COPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.94%	15.38%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.29%	35.68%	+2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.19%	41.41%	+8.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.62%	36.51%	+7.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.73%	35.55%	+2.18%

URA vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

URA vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison

URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than COPX's 2.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF	2.13%	2.68%	1.80%	2.39%	3.14%	1.48%	1.30%	1.37%	2.59%	1.57%	0.60%	1.20%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.14%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URA and COPX in my portfolio?

URA and COPX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URA or COPX?

URA has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to COPX (15.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs COPX's -83.16%.

Which ETF is better, URA or COPX?

On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 21.95% vs 17.12% for URA. On fees, COPX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, COPX has been the lower-risk option at 15.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URA or COPX?

Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 21.95% return vs 17.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URA or COPX?

COPX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URA or COPX?

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 2.13% for COPX.

What is the main difference between URA and COPX?

URA is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while COPX is Materials. URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for URA and 0.65% for COPX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.