UPW vs. USML
UPW (ProShares Ultra Utilities) and USML (ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - UPW tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Utilities Index (200%) while USML tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UPW returned 9.14%/yr vs 7.63%/yr for USML. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UPW vs. USML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPW achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly higher than USML's 0.78% return.
UPW
- 1D
- -3.91%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- 12.18%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
USML
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 0.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.63%
- 10Y*
- —
UPW vs. USML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPW ProShares Ultra Utilities | 1.51% | 23.61% | 37.67% | -22.37% | -4.59% | 29.82% |
USML ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN | 0.78% | 9.33% | 23.97% | 11.37% | -22.87% | 42.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPW and USML is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2021 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UPW and USML has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPW vs. USML — Risk / Return Rank
UPW
USML
UPW vs. USML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UPW | USML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.02 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 0.04 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 0.13 | +1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UPW | USML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 0.03 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.31 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.42 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
UPW vs. USML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPW drawdown since its inception was -77.75%, which is greater than USML's maximum drawdown of -35.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPW and USML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPW | USML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.75% | -35.34% | -42.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.15% | -13.09% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.16% | -19.14% | -14.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.42% | -35.34% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.67% | -5.74% | -11.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -10.40% | -12.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.94% | 4.36% | +4.58% |
Volatility
UPW vs. USML - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) has a higher volatility of 11.60% compared to ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN (USML) at 4.70%. This indicates that UPW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPW | USML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.60% | 4.70% | +6.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.71% | 11.61% | +12.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.25% | 16.45% | +12.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.46% | 24.48% | +9.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.20% | 24.28% | +12.92% |
UPW vs. USML - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UPW and USML have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UPW vs. USML - Dividend Comparison
UPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while USML has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPW ProShares Ultra Utilities | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.83% | 2.40% | 1.55% | 1.30% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 1.98% | 1.51% | 1.70% | 2.16% |
USML ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPW and USML have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UPW has higher volatility (11.60%) compared to USML (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPW dropped -77.75% vs USML's -35.34%.
On 5-year performance, UPW leads with 9.14% vs 7.63% for USML. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, USML has been the lower-risk option at 4.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UPW has performed better with a 9.14% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UPW and USML have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UPW has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.00% for USML.
UPW tracks Dow Jones U.S. Utilities Index (200%), while USML tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and UBS.
UPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPW and USML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer