PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPW vs. UTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPW vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPW achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 1.08% return. Over the past 10 years, UPW has underperformed UTES with an annualized return of 9.86%, while UTES has yielded a comparatively higher 12.51% annualized return.


UPW

1D
3.33%
1M
-12.03%
YTD
3.01%
6M
-1.90%
1Y
10.99%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
9.86%

UTES

1D
2.05%
1M
-4.89%
YTD
1.08%
6M
-1.15%
1Y
9.91%
3Y*
23.18%
5Y*
15.83%
10Y*
12.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPW vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UPW
ProShares Ultra Utilities
3.01%23.61%37.67%-22.37%-4.59%32.57%-17.15%48.59%2.36%22.53%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.08%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%25.48%5.14%14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between UPW and UTES is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015

0.84

The correlation between UPW and UTES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

UPW vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UPW
UTES

Utilities

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

UPW
100.0%
UTES
100.0%

Basic Materials

UPW

-

UTES

-

Communication Services

UPW

-

UTES

-

Consumer Cyclical

UPW

-

UTES

-

Consumer Defensive

UPW

-

UTES

-

Energy

UPW

-

UTES

-

Financial Services

UPW

-

UTES

-

Healthcare

UPW

-

UTES

-

Industrials

UPW

-

UTES

-

Real Estate

UPW

-

UTES

-

Technology

UPW

-

UTES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPW vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPW
UPW Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
UPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPW Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPW Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPW vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UPWUTESDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.38

0.47

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.70

0.77

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.10

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

0.79

-0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.33

1.82

-0.49

UPW vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPW Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is comparable to the UTES Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPW and UTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UPWUTESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

0.47

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.77

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.62

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.70

-0.45

Drawdowns

UPW vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPW drawdown since its inception was -77.75%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPW and UTES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPWUTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.75%

-35.39%

-42.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.15%

-13.88%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.16%

-17.62%

-15.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.42%

-20.40%

-29.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.67%

-35.39%

-27.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.46%

-8.36%

-8.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.59%

-5.52%

-17.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.73%

6.05%

+2.68%

Volatility

UPW vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) has a higher volatility of 11.15% compared to Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) at 7.44%. This indicates that UPW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPWUTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.15%

7.44%

+3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.82%

17.12%

+6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.05%

21.26%

+7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.42%

20.59%

+13.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.18%

20.16%

+17.02%

UPW vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

UPW vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

UPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than UTES's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UPW
ProShares Ultra Utilities
1.55%1.67%1.83%2.40%1.55%1.30%0.83%0.83%1.98%1.51%1.70%2.16%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.48%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


UPW and UTES have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPW has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to UTES (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPW dropped -77.75% vs UTES's -35.39%.

On 10-year performance, UTES leads with 12.51% vs 9.86% for UPW. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, UTES has been the lower-risk option at 7.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UTES has performed better with a 12.51% return vs 9.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UPW.

UPW has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 1.48% for UTES.

UPW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UPW and 0.49% for UTES.

UTES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPW and UTES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer