UPV vs. LINT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

UPV (ProShares Ultra Europe) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UPV is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UPV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

UPV vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPV achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 395.01% return.

UPV

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -1.91%
• 6M: 2.53%
• YTD: 8.72%
• 1Y: 24.66%
• 3Y*: 21.43%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: 11.66%

LINT

• 1D: -12.33%
• 1M: -36.20%
• 6M: 257.06%
• YTD: 395.01%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPV vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe	8.72%	12.60%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	395.01%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between UPV and LINT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.36

UPV vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UPV	LINT
Financial Services	36.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

UPV vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPV

UPV Risk / Return Rank: 28
UPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
UPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
UPV Omega Ratio Rank: 26
UPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
UPV Martin Ratio Rank: 30

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPV vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UPV	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.51	—	—

Drawdowns

UPV vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPV drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPV and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	UPV	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.25%	-49.54%	-17.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.23%	-48.95%	+42.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.73%	-20.99%	+0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.04%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UPV	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.50%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.31%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.73%	168.59%	-136.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.54%	168.59%	-133.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.14%	168.59%	-132.45%

UPV vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

UPV vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

UPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than LINT's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.55%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe	2.28%	2.11%	2.70%	1.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.65%	3.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UPV and LINT in my portfolio?

UPV and LINT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UPV or LINT?

On fees, UPV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UPV or LINT?

UPV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UPV or LINT?

UPV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.55% for LINT.

What is the main difference between UPV and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UPV and 0.97% for LINT.