UPV vs. EFO
UPV (ProShares Ultra Europe) and EFO (ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - UPV tracks the MSCI Europe Index (200%) while EFO tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UPV returned 10.86%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for EFO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UPV vs. EFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPV achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than EFO's 14.71% return. Over the past 10 years, UPV has outperformed EFO with an annualized return of 10.86%, while EFO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.20% annualized return.
UPV
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 10.86%
EFO
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 14.71%
- 6M
- 18.99%
- 1Y
- 35.57%
- 3Y*
- 24.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
UPV vs. EFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 9.44% | 68.63% | -4.51% | 32.16% | -36.58% | 32.38% | -3.15% | 47.04% | -32.64% | 57.44% |
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 14.71% | 58.51% | -2.15% | 25.77% | -33.62% | 19.38% | 2.29% | 40.93% | -30.91% | 51.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPV and EFO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2010 | 0.82 |
The correlation between UPV and EFO shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UPV vs. EFO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UPV
EFO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
UPV
EFO
Basic Materials
UPV
-
EFO
-
Communication Services
UPV
-
EFO
-
Consumer Cyclical
UPV
-
EFO
-
Consumer Defensive
UPV
-
EFO
-
Energy
UPV
-
EFO
-
Healthcare
UPV
-
EFO
-
Industrials
UPV
-
EFO
-
Real Estate
UPV
-
EFO
-
Technology
UPV
-
EFO
-
Utilities
UPV
-
EFO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPV vs. EFO — Risk / Return Rank
UPV
EFO
UPV vs. EFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UPV | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.21 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.61 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.31 | 5.57 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UPV | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.17 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.30 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.23 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
UPV vs. EFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPV drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than EFO's maximum drawdown of -63.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPV and EFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPV | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.25% | -63.52% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.41% | -22.18% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.54% | -26.85% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.33% | -53.95% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.25% | -63.52% | -3.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.61% | -4.01% | -1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.82% | -18.67% | -2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.86% | 6.40% | +0.46% |
Volatility
UPV vs. EFO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) has a higher volatility of 11.30% compared to ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) at 9.89%. This indicates that UPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPV | EFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.30% | 9.89% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.67% | 25.21% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.76% | 30.52% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.39% | 32.98% | +2.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.14% | 34.09% | +3.05% |
UPV vs. EFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UPV and EFO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UPV vs. EFO - Dividend Comparison
UPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than EFO's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.51% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% |
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 2.09% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 3.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, UPV and EFO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
UPV has higher volatility (11.30%) compared to EFO (9.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPV dropped -67.25% vs EFO's -63.52%.
On 10-year performance, UPV leads with 10.86% vs 10.20% for EFO. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EFO has been the lower-risk option at 9.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UPV has performed better with a 10.86% return vs 10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UPV and EFO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UPV has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.51% for EFO.
UPV tracks MSCI Europe Index (200%), while EFO tracks MSCI EAFE Index (200%).
EFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPV and EFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer