UPSX vs. ISCMF
UPSX (Tradr 2X Long UPST Daily ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UPSX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. UPSX is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. UPSX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
UPSX vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPSX achieves a -64.53% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.
UPSX
- 1D
- -12.72%
- 1M
- -15.45%
- YTD
- -64.53%
- 6M
- -68.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 27.76%
- 1Y
- 37.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPSX vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UPSX Tradr 2X Long UPST Daily ETF | -64.53% | -60.75% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 12.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPSX and ISCMF is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPSX vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
UPSX
ISCMF
UPSX vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long UPST Daily ETF (UPSX) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UPSX | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | 0.45 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
UPSX vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPSX drawdown since its inception was -95.01%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPSX and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPSX | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.01% | -25.42% | -69.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.01% | -5.26% | -87.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.03% | -13.43% | -52.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.42% | — |
Volatility
UPSX vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPSX | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.77% | 18.53% | +122.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 140.77% | 14.38% | +126.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 140.77% | 14.38% | +126.39% |
UPSX vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPSX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPSX vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
Neither UPSX nor ISCMF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UPSX and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for UPSX.
UPSX and ISCMF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
UPSX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for UPSX and 0.19% for ISCMF.
Find the right allocation for UPSX and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer