UPSX vs. PATX
UPSX (Tradr 2X Long UPST Daily ETF) and PATX (Tradr 2X Long PATH Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. UPSX is actively managed, while PATX is passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UPSX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for PATX.
Performance
UPSX vs. PATX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UPSX
- 1D
- -12.72%
- 1M
- -15.45%
- YTD
- -64.53%
- 6M
- -68.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PATX
- 1D
- -8.52%
- 1M
- 10.06%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPSX vs. PATX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UPSX Tradr 2X Long UPST Daily ETF | -68.67% |
PATX Tradr 2X Long PATH Daily ETF | -57.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPSX and PATX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPSX vs. PATX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long UPST Daily ETF (UPSX) and Tradr 2X Long PATH Daily ETF (PATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UPSX | PATX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | -0.72 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
UPSX vs. PATX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPSX drawdown since its inception was -95.01%, which is greater than PATX's maximum drawdown of -70.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPSX and PATX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPSX | PATX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.01% | -70.28% | -24.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.01% | -57.14% | -35.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.03% | -52.44% | -13.59% |
Volatility
UPSX vs. PATX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPSX | PATX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.77% | 124.51% | +16.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 140.77% | 124.51% | +16.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 140.77% | 124.51% | +16.26% |
UPSX vs. PATX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPSX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PATX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPSX vs. PATX - Dividend Comparison
Neither UPSX nor PATX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UPSX and PATX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UPSX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UPSX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for PATX.
UPSX and PATX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.30% for UPSX and 1.49% for PATX.
Find the right allocation for UPSX and PATX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer