UPSD vs. BDBT

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

UPSD (Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF) and BDBT (Bluemonte Core Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UPSD is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Aptus, while BDBT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Bluemonte. Over the past year, UPSD returned 16.51% vs 3.91% for BDBT. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UPSD charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BDBT.

Performance

UPSD vs. BDBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD) and Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPSD achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly higher than BDBT's 0.08% return.

UPSD

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 4.09%
• 6M: 5.98%
• YTD: 8.00%
• 1Y: 16.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDBT

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -0.13%
• 6M: -0.00%
• YTD: 0.08%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPSD vs. BDBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF	8.00%	14.07%
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	0.08%	3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between UPSD and BDBT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

UPSD vs. BDBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPSD

UPSD Risk / Return Rank: 41
UPSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
UPSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
UPSD Omega Ratio Rank: 41
UPSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
UPSD Martin Ratio Rank: 45

BDBT

BDBT Risk / Return Rank: 34
BDBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
BDBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
BDBT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
BDBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
BDBT Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPSD vs. BDBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD) and Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UPSD	BDBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	1.02	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	1.51	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.18	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	1.36	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.46	3.64	+1.81

UPSD vs. BDBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPSD Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the BDBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPSD and BDBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UPSD vs. BDBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPSD drawdown since its inception was -23.85%, which is greater than BDBT's maximum drawdown of -2.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPSD and BDBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	UPSD	BDBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.85%	-2.88%	-20.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.91%	-2.88%	-9.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-1.72%	+0.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-0.79%	-2.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	1.07%	+1.96%

Volatility

UPSD vs. BDBT - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) at 1.15%. This indicates that UPSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UPSD	BDBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.41%	1.15%	+2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.04%	2.97%	+8.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.28%	3.85%	+10.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.70%	3.86%	+16.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.70%	3.86%	+16.84%

UPSD vs. BDBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPSD has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BDBT's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

UPSD vs. BDBT - Dividend Comparison

UPSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than BDBT's 3.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	3.87%	2.21%	0.00%
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF	0.67%	0.67%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UPSD and BDBT in my portfolio?

UPSD and BDBT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UPSD or BDBT?

UPSD has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to BDBT (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPSD dropped -23.85% vs BDBT's -2.88%.

Which ETF is better, UPSD or BDBT?

On 1-year performance, UPSD leads with 16.51% vs 3.91% for BDBT. On fees, BDBT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, BDBT has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UPSD or BDBT?

Over the 1-year period, UPSD has performed better with a 16.51% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UPSD or BDBT?

BDBT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UPSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UPSD or BDBT?

BDBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 0.67% for UPSD.

What is the main difference between UPSD and BDBT?

UPSD is categorized as Actively Managed, while BDBT is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UPSD and 0.23% for BDBT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UPSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.