UPS vs. MLPX
UPS (United Parcel Service, Inc.) is a stock, while MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Over the past 10 years, UPS returned 4.05%/yr vs 12.30%/yr for MLPX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UPS vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPS achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 23.61% return. Over the past 10 years, UPS has underperformed MLPX with an annualized return of 4.05%, while MLPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.
UPS
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 5.07%
- YTD
- 10.33%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 12.74%
- 3Y*
- -9.58%
- 5Y*
- -8.34%
- 10Y*
- 4.05%
MLPX
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- 23.61%
- 6M
- 23.85%
- 1Y
- 23.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.96%
- 5Y*
- 20.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
UPS vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | 10.33% | -15.93% | -15.93% | -5.96% | -16.21% | 30.02% | 48.64% | 24.24% | -15.48% | 7.14% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.61% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | 21.54% | 39.63% | -20.32% | 19.04% | -15.64% | -4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPS and MLPX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2013 | 0.33 |
The correlation between UPS and MLPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPS vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
UPS
MLPX
UPS vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPS | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.27 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 2.92 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.06 | 6.98 | -5.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPS vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPS drawdown since its inception was -57.92%, smaller than the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPS and MLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPS | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.92% | -70.67% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.28% | -8.18% | -12.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.71% | -16.77% | -33.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.92% | -19.72% | -38.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.92% | -64.70% | +6.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.26% | -5.67% | -37.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.36% | -16.58% | +1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.01% | 3.42% | +8.59% |
Volatility
UPS vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) at 5.79%. This indicates that UPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPS | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.94% | 5.79% | +4.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.29% | 11.89% | +10.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.11% | 15.42% | +14.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 20.00% | +8.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.65% | 26.47% | +1.18% |
Dividends
UPS vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
UPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than MLPX's 4.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.15% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | 6.18% | 6.61% | 5.17% | 4.12% | 3.50% | 1.90% | 2.40% | 3.28% | 3.73% | 2.79% | 2.72% | 3.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPS and MLPX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UPS has higher volatility (9.94%) compared to MLPX (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPS dropped -57.92% vs MLPX's -70.67%.
MLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPS and MLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer