PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPS vs. EMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UPS vs. EMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPS achieves a 20.93% return, which is significantly higher than EMR's 5.76% return. Over the past 10 years, UPS has underperformed EMR with an annualized return of 4.43%, while EMR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.35% annualized return.


UPS

1D
2.82%
1M
10.95%
6M
12.59%
YTD
20.93%
1Y
25.72%
3Y*
-9.86%
5Y*
-7.32%
10Y*
4.43%
ALL TIME*
5.17%

EMR

1D
1.96%
1M
-7.57%
6M
-3.35%
YTD
5.76%
1Y
-0.97%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
12.35%
ALL TIME*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPS vs. EMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UPS
United Parcel Service, Inc.
20.93%-15.93%-15.93%-5.96%-16.21%30.02%48.64%24.24%-15.48%7.14%
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
5.76%8.92%29.73%3.75%5.74%18.19%8.61%31.53%-11.87%29.05%

Correlation

The correlation between UPS and EMR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 1999

0.51

The correlation between UPS and EMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UPS:

$86.86B

EMR:

$77.99B

EPS

UPS:

$6.17

EMR:

$4.33

PE Ratio

UPS:

18.85

EMR:

32.14

PS Ratio

UPS:

1.12

EMR:

4.29

PB Ratio

UPS:

6.27

EMR:

3.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

UPS:

$88.34B

EMR:

$18.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UPS:

$16.03B

EMR:

$7.22B

EBITDA (TTM)

UPS:

$10.63B

EMR:

$3.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPS vs. EMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPS
UPS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
UPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
UPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

EMR
EMR Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMR Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPS vs. EMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UPSEMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.02

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

-0.04

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

-0.08

+2.36

UPS vs. EMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPS Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the EMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPS and EMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UPS vs. EMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPS drawdown since its inception was -57.92%, roughly equal to the maximum EMR drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPS and EMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPSEMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.92%

-59.05%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.90%

-23.45%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.71%

-29.62%

-21.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.92%

-29.62%

-28.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.92%

-50.77%

-7.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.81%

-13.19%

-24.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.42%

-14.11%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.33%

11.45%

-0.12%

Volatility

UPS vs. EMR - Volatility Comparison

United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) have volatilities of 8.21% and 8.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPSEMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.21%

8.57%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.09%

25.47%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.53%

31.21%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.72%

27.39%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.75%

29.15%

-1.40%

Dividends

UPS vs. EMR - Dividend Comparison

UPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than EMR's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
1.57%1.61%1.70%2.14%2.15%2.18%2.49%2.58%3.26%2.76%3.42%3.94%
UPS
United Parcel Service, Inc.
5.64%6.61%5.17%4.12%3.50%1.90%2.40%3.28%3.73%2.79%2.72%3.03%

Financials

UPS vs. EMR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between United Parcel Service, Inc. and Emerson Electric Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
21.20B
4.56B
(UPS) Total Revenue
(EMR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UPS vs. EMR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between United Parcel Service, Inc. and Emerson Electric Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
17.0%
0
Portfolio components
UPS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.60B and revenue of 21.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.0%.

EMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Emerson Electric Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

UPS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

EMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Emerson Electric Co. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

UPS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported a net income of 864.00M and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.

EMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Emerson Electric Co. reported a net income of 618.00M and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UPS and EMR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMR has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to UPS (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPS dropped -57.92% vs EMR's -59.05%.

UPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPS and EMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer