UPS vs. EMR
UPS (United Parcel Service, Inc.) and EMR (Emerson Electric Co.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — UPS in Integrated Freight & Logistics, EMR in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 10 years, UPS returned 4.19%/yr vs 12.97%/yr for EMR. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
UPS vs. EMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPS achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly higher than EMR's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, UPS has underperformed EMR with an annualized return of 4.19%, while EMR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.97% annualized return.
UPS
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 11.95%
- 6M
- 16.21%
- 1Y
- 17.16%
- 3Y*
- -9.35%
- 5Y*
- -7.66%
- 10Y*
- 4.19%
EMR
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- 14.43%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.97%
UPS vs. EMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | 11.95% | -15.93% | -15.93% | -5.96% | -16.21% | 30.02% | 48.64% | 24.24% | -15.48% | 7.14% |
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 5.61% | 8.92% | 29.73% | 3.75% | 5.74% | 18.19% | 8.61% | 31.53% | -11.87% | 29.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPS and EMR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 1999 | 0.51 |
The correlation between UPS and EMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
UPS:
$91.55B
EMR:
$78.30B
UPS:
$6.18
EMR:
$4.33
UPS:
17.43
EMR:
32.10
UPS:
1.04
EMR:
4.28
UPS:
5.81
EMR:
3.85
UPS:
$88.34B
EMR:
$18.32B
UPS:
$16.03B
EMR:
$7.22B
UPS:
$10.63B
EMR:
$3.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPS vs. EMR — Risk / Return Rank
UPS
EMR
UPS vs. EMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UPS | EMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.11 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 0.62 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.45 | 1.35 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UPS | EMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 0.48 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | 0.35 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.45 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.34 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
UPS vs. EMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPS drawdown since its inception was -57.92%, roughly equal to the maximum EMR drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPS and EMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPS | EMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.92% | -59.05% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.28% | -23.45% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.71% | -29.62% | -21.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.92% | -29.62% | -28.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.92% | -50.77% | -7.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.43% | -13.31% | -29.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -14.11% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.89% | 10.68% | +1.21% |
Volatility
UPS vs. EMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) is 6.35%, while Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that UPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPS | EMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.35% | 7.27% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.84% | 24.63% | -3.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.21% | 30.04% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.37% | 27.25% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.54% | 29.10% | -1.56% |
Dividends
UPS vs. EMR - Dividend Comparison
UPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than EMR's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.70% | 2.14% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.49% | 2.58% | 3.26% | 2.76% | 3.42% | 3.94% |
UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | 6.09% | 6.61% | 5.17% | 4.12% | 3.50% | 1.90% | 2.40% | 3.28% | 3.73% | 2.79% | 2.72% | 3.03% |
Financials
UPS vs. EMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between United Parcel Service, Inc. and Emerson Electric Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UPS vs. EMR - Profitability Comparison
UPS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.60B and revenue of 21.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.0%.
EMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emerson Electric Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
UPS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.
EMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emerson Electric Co. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
UPS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported a net income of 864.00M and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.
EMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emerson Electric Co. reported a net income of 618.00M and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UPS and EMR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMR has higher volatility (7.27%) compared to UPS (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPS dropped -57.92% vs EMR's -59.05%.
UPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPS and EMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer