PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPS vs. COP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UPS vs. COP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPS achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly lower than COP's 26.87% return. Over the past 10 years, UPS has underperformed COP with an annualized return of 4.31%, while COP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.


UPS

1D
-0.51%
1M
11.11%
YTD
12.37%
6M
10.44%
1Y
15.53%
3Y*
-9.66%
5Y*
-7.78%
10Y*
4.31%

COP

1D
1.40%
1M
-4.44%
YTD
26.87%
6M
24.31%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
18.49%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPS vs. COP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UPS
United Parcel Service, Inc.
12.37%-15.93%-15.93%-5.96%-16.21%30.02%48.64%24.24%-15.48%7.14%
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
26.87%-2.34%-12.02%1.98%71.69%86.60%-36.04%6.63%15.63%11.95%

Correlation

The correlation between UPS and COP is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 1999

0.31

The correlation between UPS and COP shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UPS:

$91.89B

COP:

$143.30B

EPS

UPS:

$6.18

COP:

$5.90

PE Ratio

UPS:

17.49

COP:

19.83

PS Ratio

UPS:

1.04

COP:

2.49

PB Ratio

UPS:

5.83

COP:

2.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

UPS:

$88.34B

COP:

$58.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UPS:

$16.03B

COP:

$17.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

UPS:

$10.63B

COP:

$22.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPS vs. COP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPS
UPS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
UPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
UPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPS Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

COP
COP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
COP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
COP Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
COP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
COP Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPS vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UPSCOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.17

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

1.86

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.22

4.08

-2.86

UPS vs. COP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPS Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the COP Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPS and COP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UPS vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPS drawdown since its inception was -57.92%, smaller than the maximum COP drawdown of -84.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPS and COP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPSCOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.92%

-84.55%

+26.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.28%

-14.90%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.71%

-36.19%

-14.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.92%

-36.19%

-21.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.92%

-70.66%

+12.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.22%

-11.92%

-30.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.33%

-25.49%

+10.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.93%

6.80%

+5.13%

Volatility

UPS vs. COP - Volatility Comparison

United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP) have volatilities of 9.06% and 8.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPSCOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.06%

8.72%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.69%

23.05%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.72%

29.33%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.46%

32.80%

-4.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.61%

37.64%

-10.03%

Dividends

UPS vs. COP - Dividend Comparison

UPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than COP's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
2.82%3.40%3.35%3.37%4.23%2.70%4.23%2.05%1.86%1.93%1.99%6.30%
UPS
United Parcel Service, Inc.
6.07%6.61%5.17%4.12%3.50%1.90%2.40%3.28%3.73%2.79%2.72%3.03%

Financials

UPS vs. COP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between United Parcel Service, Inc. and ConocoPhillips Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
21.20B
16.05B
(UPS) Total Revenue
(COP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UPS vs. COP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between United Parcel Service, Inc. and ConocoPhillips Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
17.0%
46.7%
Portfolio components
UPS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.60B and revenue of 21.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.0%.

COP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 7.50B and revenue of 16.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.

UPS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

COP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

UPS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported a net income of 864.00M and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.

COP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UPS and COP have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPS has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to COP (8.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPS dropped -57.92% vs COP's -84.55%.

COP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPS and COP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer