PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPRO vs. CRMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPRO vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPRO achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -71.26% return.


UPRO

1D
-4.27%
1M
-5.38%
YTD
17.21%
6M
13.86%
1Y
62.29%
3Y*
46.23%
5Y*
20.37%
10Y*
30.18%

CRMG

1D
4.23%
1M
-29.64%
YTD
-71.26%
6M
-71.01%
1Y
-73.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPRO vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
17.21%79.06%
CRMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF
-71.26%-0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between UPRO and CRMG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPRO vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPRO
UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CRMG
CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPRO vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UPROCRMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.79

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

-0.97

+3.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.52

-1.70

+11.22

UPRO vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the CRMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPRO and CRMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UPRO vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPRO drawdown since its inception was -76.82%, roughly equal to the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPRO and CRMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPROCRMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.82%

-79.83%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.78%

-76.80%

+50.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.27%

-78.97%

+68.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.39%

-39.18%

+24.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.57%

43.41%

-36.84%

Volatility

UPRO vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) is 14.68%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) has a volatility of 32.53%. This indicates that UPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPROCRMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.68%

32.53%

-17.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.49%

63.74%

-34.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.35%

76.12%

-38.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.62%

75.39%

-24.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.79%

75.39%

-21.60%

UPRO vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPRO has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

UPRO vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

UPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
0.74%0.84%0.93%0.74%0.52%0.06%0.11%0.41%0.63%0.00%0.12%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


UPRO and CRMG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRMG has higher volatility (32.53%) compared to UPRO (14.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPRO dropped -76.82% vs CRMG's -79.83%.

On 1-year performance, UPRO leads with 62.29% vs -73.99% for CRMG. On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UPRO has been the lower-risk option at 14.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 62.29% return vs -73.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for UPRO.

UPRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for UPRO and 0.75% for CRMG.

UPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPRO and CRMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer