UPRO vs. BULZ

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

UPRO (ProShares UltraPro S&P 500) and BULZ (MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - UPRO tracks the S&P 500 while BULZ tracks the Solactive FANG Innovation Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UPRO returned 42.98%/yr vs 68.81%/yr for BULZ. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UPRO charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BULZ.

Performance

UPRO vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) and MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPRO achieves a 23.12% return, which is significantly lower than BULZ's 38.51% return.

UPRO

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: -0.42%
• 6M: 26.37%
• YTD: 23.12%
• 1Y: 49.68%
• 3Y*: 42.98%
• 5Y*: 19.90%
• 10Y*: 28.31%
• ALL TIME*: 33.26%

BULZ

• 1D: 10.04%
• 1M: -16.61%
• 6M: 40.54%
• YTD: 38.51%
• 1Y: 89.80%
• 3Y*: 68.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPRO vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500	23.12%	31.88%	63.57%	68.53%	-56.84%	21.32%
BULZ MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs	38.51%	60.09%	54.09%	394.22%	-92.26%	9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between UPRO and BULZ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2021	0.87

The correlation between UPRO and BULZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

UPRO vs. BULZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UPRO	BULZ
Technology	38.5%	65.0%
Financial Services	11.6%	13.3%
Communication Services	9.9%	20.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	14.2%
Healthcare	8.9%	-
Industrials	8.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Energy	3.0%	-
Utilities	2.2%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

UPRO vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPRO

UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 51
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

BULZ

BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 42
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPRO vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) and MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UPRO	BULZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.10	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	1.71	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.22	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	1.67	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.30	3.92	+3.38

UPRO vs. BULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the BULZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPRO and BULZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UPRO vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPRO drawdown since its inception was -76.82%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPRO and BULZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	UPRO	BULZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.82%	-94.44%	+17.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.78%	-54.22%	+27.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.87%	-67.96%	+19.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.74%	-34.74%	+29.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.36%	-57.65%	+43.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.82%	22.96%	-16.14%

Volatility

UPRO vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) is 10.14%, while MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ) has a volatility of 26.72%. This indicates that UPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UPRO	BULZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.14%	26.72%	-16.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.24%	66.44%	-36.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.77%	82.28%	-44.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.62%	91.72%	-41.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.74%	91.72%	-37.98%

UPRO vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPRO has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

UPRO vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison

UPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BULZ MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500	0.76%	0.84%	0.93%	0.74%	0.52%	0.06%	0.11%	0.41%	0.63%	0.00%	0.12%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UPRO and BULZ in my portfolio?

UPRO and BULZ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UPRO or BULZ?

BULZ has higher volatility (26.72%) compared to UPRO (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPRO dropped -76.82% vs BULZ's -94.44%.

Which ETF is better, UPRO or BULZ?

On 3-year performance, BULZ leads with 68.81% vs 42.98% for UPRO. On fees, UPRO is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, UPRO has been the lower-risk option at 10.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UPRO or BULZ?

Over the 3-year period, BULZ has performed better with a 68.81% return vs 42.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UPRO or BULZ?

UPRO is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BULZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UPRO or BULZ?

UPRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for BULZ.

What is the main difference between UPRO and BULZ?

UPRO tracks S&P 500, while BULZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for UPRO and 0.95% for BULZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.