UPRO vs. ARMG
UPRO (ProShares UltraPro S&P 500) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UPRO is passively managed, while ARMG is actively managed. Over the past year, UPRO returned 80.84% vs 510.84% for ARMG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UPRO charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.
Performance
UPRO vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPRO achieves a 27.90% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 936.32% return.
UPRO
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- 14.64%
- YTD
- 27.90%
- 6M
- 26.67%
- 1Y
- 80.84%
- 3Y*
- 52.58%
- 5Y*
- 23.13%
- 10Y*
- 30.09%
ARMG
- 1D
- 4.85%
- 1M
- 261.28%
- YTD
- 936.32%
- 6M
- 526.62%
- 1Y
- 510.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPRO vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 27.90% | 35.36% |
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 936.32% | -61.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPRO and ARMG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | 0.60 |
The correlation between UPRO and ARMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPRO vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank
UPRO
ARMG
UPRO vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UPRO | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.46 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 7.56 | -4.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.80 | 13.34 | -0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UPRO | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 3.96 | -1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.24 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
UPRO vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPRO drawdown since its inception was -76.82%, roughly equal to the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPRO and ARMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPRO | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.82% | -80.28% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.78% | -68.13% | +41.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | 0.00% | -2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.42% | -53.04% | +38.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.33% | 38.55% | -32.22% |
Volatility
UPRO vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) is 8.45%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a volatility of 64.57%. This indicates that UPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPRO | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.45% | 64.57% | -56.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.60% | 103.90% | -77.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.35% | 130.31% | -94.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.32% | 138.30% | -87.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.74% | 138.30% | -84.56% |
UPRO vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPRO has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPRO vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison
UPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than ARMG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 0.47% | 4.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 0.52% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPRO and ARMG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARMG has higher volatility (64.57%) compared to UPRO (8.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPRO dropped -76.82% vs ARMG's -80.28%.
On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 510.84% vs 80.84% for UPRO. On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UPRO has been the lower-risk option at 8.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 510.84% return vs 80.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for UPRO.
UPRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.47% for ARMG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for UPRO and 0.75% for ARMG.
ARMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPRO and ARMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer