UPGD vs. FLDZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

UPGD (Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF) and FLDZ (RiverNorth Patriot ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. UPGD is passively managed, while FLDZ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UPGD returned 13.33%/yr vs 11.28%/yr for FLDZ. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UPGD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FLDZ.

Performance

UPGD vs. FLDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPGD achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly higher than FLDZ's 5.57% return.

UPGD

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: 7.66%
• YTD: 11.58%
• 1Y: 16.65%
• 3Y*: 13.33%
• 5Y*: 7.44%
• 10Y*: 10.03%

FLDZ

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: -1.36%
• 6M: 2.43%
• YTD: 5.57%
• 1Y: 6.60%
• 3Y*: 11.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPGD vs. FLDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
UPGD Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF	11.58%	8.89%	13.28%	15.65%	-13.17%
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	5.57%	6.66%	15.99%	12.15%	-12.07%

Correlation

The correlation between UPGD and FLDZ is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2022	0.91

The correlation between UPGD and FLDZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UPGD vs. FLDZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UPGD	FLDZ
Consumer Cyclical	25.1%	13.8%
Industrials	22.2%	12.4%
Consumer Defensive	19.4%	5.0%
Technology	13.8%	3.5%
Utilities	7.8%	11.4%
Healthcare	6.4%	12.9%
Basic Materials	3.7%	1.9%
Communication Services	1.6%	3.7%
Financial Services	0.0%	15.9%
Energy	-	10.5%
Real Estate	-	8.4%

Return for Risk

UPGD vs. FLDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPGD

UPGD Risk / Return Rank: 39
UPGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
UPGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
UPGD Omega Ratio Rank: 36
UPGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
UPGD Martin Ratio Rank: 42

FLDZ

FLDZ Risk / Return Rank: 21
FLDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FLDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FLDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FLDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
FLDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPGD vs. FLDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UPGD	FLDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	0.51	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	0.81	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.09	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	0.94	+0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.35	2.84	+2.51

UPGD vs. FLDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPGD Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the FLDZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPGD and FLDZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UPGD vs. FLDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPGD drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, which is greater than FLDZ's maximum drawdown of -19.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGD and FLDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	UPGD	FLDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.74%	-19.54%	-41.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.01%	-6.25%	-3.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.90%	-17.43%	+0.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	-2.87%	+2.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-5.86%	-4.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	2.07%	+0.86%

Volatility

UPGD vs. FLDZ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF (UPGD) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) at 3.27%. This indicates that UPGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UPGD	FLDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.86%	3.27%	+1.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.73%	7.88%	+2.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.02%	11.48%	+2.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.66%	16.79%	+1.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.54%	16.79%	+4.75%

UPGD vs. FLDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPGD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDZ's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

UPGD vs. FLDZ - Dividend Comparison

UPGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than FLDZ's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	1.46%	1.54%	1.17%	1.39%	1.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UPGD Invesco Bloomberg Analyst Rating Improvers ETF	1.57%	1.75%	1.28%	1.39%	0.72%	0.52%	0.28%	0.20%	1.43%	0.00%	1.55%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UPGD and FLDZ in my portfolio?

UPGD and FLDZ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UPGD or FLDZ?

UPGD has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to FLDZ (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPGD dropped -60.74% vs FLDZ's -19.54%.

Which ETF is better, UPGD or FLDZ?

On 3-year performance, UPGD leads with 13.33% vs 11.28% for FLDZ. On fees, UPGD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FLDZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UPGD or FLDZ?

Over the 3-year period, UPGD has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 11.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UPGD or FLDZ?

UPGD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UPGD or FLDZ?

UPGD has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.46% for FLDZ.

What is the main difference between UPGD and FLDZ?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for UPGD and 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UPGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.