UPAR vs. NANC
UPAR (UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF) and NANC (Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UPAR is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the NONE, while NANC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tidal. UPAR is passively managed, while NANC is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UPAR returned 8.22%/yr vs 20.55%/yr for NANC. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UPAR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for NANC.
Performance
UPAR vs. NANC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPAR achieves a 3.37% return, which is significantly lower than NANC's 9.12% return.
UPAR
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 3.37%
- 1Y
- 15.74%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.97%
NANC
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 19.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $826.89K | $806.25K | $1.03M | |
| $78.06K | $57.40K | $209.69K |
UPAR vs. NANC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UPAR UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF | 3.37% | 23.87% | -2.26% | -1.00% |
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 9.12% | 18.54% | 26.83% | 22.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPAR and NANC is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2023 | 0.47 |
The correlation between UPAR and NANC shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPAR vs. NANC — Risk / Return Rank
UPAR
NANC
UPAR vs. NANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPAR | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.21 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 1.47 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.61 | 5.80 | -2.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPAR vs. NANC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPAR drawdown since its inception was -39.54%, which is greater than NANC's maximum drawdown of -20.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPAR and NANC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPAR | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.54% | -20.94% | -18.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -12.21% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.04% | -20.94% | +4.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.76% | -1.72% | -8.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.91% | -2.64% | -19.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.51% | 3.09% | +1.42% |
Volatility
UPAR vs. NANC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR) is 3.57%, while Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that UPAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPAR | NANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 4.54% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | 11.90% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.31% | 14.96% | -0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 16.81% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 16.81% | +1.16% |
UPAR vs. NANC - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPAR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than NANC's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPAR vs. NANC - Dividend Comparison
UPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than NANC's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.20% | 0.94% | 0.00% |
UPAR UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF | 3.41% | 3.28% | 3.32% | 3.04% | 4.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPAR and NANC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NANC has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to UPAR (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPAR dropped -39.54% vs NANC's -20.94%.
On 3-year performance, NANC leads with 20.55% vs 8.22% for UPAR. On fees, UPAR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, UPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NANC has performed better with a 20.55% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UPAR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for NANC.
UPAR has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 0.19% for NANC.
UPAR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while NANC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for UPAR and 0.72% for NANC.
NANC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPAR and NANC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer