UPAL vs. TQQQ
UPAL (ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - UPAL is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by ProShares, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). UPAL is actively managed, while TQQQ is passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UPAL vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UPAL
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TQQQ
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -18.18%
- 6M
- 25.45%
- YTD
- 28.83%
- 1Y
- 56.98%
- 3Y*
- 48.57%
- 5Y*
- 17.01%
- 10Y*
- 40.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 42.82%
UPAL vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UPAL ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF | -41.70% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 16.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPAL and TQQQ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPAL vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
UPAL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TQQQ
UPAL vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF (UPAL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPAL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.55 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPAL vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPAL drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPAL and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPAL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.54% | -81.66% | +33.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.70% | -22.26% | -19.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.55% | -18.48% | -10.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.30% | — |
Volatility
UPAL vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPAL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.47% | 55.82% | +23.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.47% | 67.79% | +11.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.47% | 66.44% | +13.03% |
UPAL vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UPAL and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UPAL vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
UPAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than TQQQ's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.56% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
UPAL ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPAL and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UPAL and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.26% for UPAL.
UPAL is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities.
Find the right allocation for UPAL and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer