UPAL vs. GLDW
UPAL (ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF) and GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UPAL is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by ProShares, while GLDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UPAL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GLDW.
Performance
UPAL vs. GLDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UPAL
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -22.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDW
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -13.96%
- YTD
- -10.88%
- 6M
- -11.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPAL vs. GLDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UPAL ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF | -43.92% |
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | -20.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPAL and GLDW is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPAL vs. GLDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF (UPAL) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPAL vs. GLDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPAL drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, which is greater than GLDW's maximum drawdown of -32.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPAL and GLDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPAL | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.54% | -32.25% | -16.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.92% | -31.62% | -12.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.97% | -10.82% | -14.15% |
Volatility
UPAL vs. GLDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPAL | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.57% | 37.17% | +43.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.57% | 37.17% | +43.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.57% | 37.17% | +43.40% |
UPAL vs. GLDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPAL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPAL vs. GLDW - Dividend Comparison
UPAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than GLDW's 24.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 24.53% | 3.75% |
UPAL ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF | 0.27% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPAL and GLDW have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UPAL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UPAL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.
GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 24.53%, compared with 0.27% for UPAL.
UPAL is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while GLDW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UPAL and 0.99% for GLDW.
Find the right allocation for UPAL and GLDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer