PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPAL vs. GLDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPAL vs. GLDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF (UPAL) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UPAL

1D
0.78%
1M
-22.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDW

1D
-1.70%
1M
-13.96%
YTD
-10.88%
6M
-11.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPAL vs. GLDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UPAL and GLDW is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPAL vs. GLDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF (UPAL) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UPAL vs. GLDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UPAL vs. GLDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPAL drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, which is greater than GLDW's maximum drawdown of -32.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPAL and GLDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPALGLDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.54%

-32.25%

-16.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.92%

-31.62%

-12.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.97%

-10.82%

-14.15%

Volatility

UPAL vs. GLDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPALGLDWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.57%

37.17%

+43.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.57%

37.17%

+43.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.57%

37.17%

+43.40%

UPAL vs. GLDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPAL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

UPAL vs. GLDW - Dividend Comparison

UPAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than GLDW's 24.53% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GLDW
Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF
24.53%3.75%
UPAL
ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF
0.27%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UPAL and GLDW have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UPAL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UPAL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.

GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 24.53%, compared with 0.27% for UPAL.

UPAL is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while GLDW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UPAL and 0.99% for GLDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPAL and GLDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer