GLDW vs. NUGT
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT).
GLDW and NUGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLDW is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Oct 30, 2025. NUGT is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (300%). It was launched on Apr 1, 2020.
Performance
GLDW vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLDW vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 8.62% | 7.63% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares | 2.59% | 35.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDW achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than NUGT's 2.59% return.
GLDW
- 1D
- 4.69%
- 1M
- -13.64%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUGT
- 1D
- 14.02%
- 1M
- -39.84%
- YTD
- 2.59%
- 6M
- 22.25%
- 1Y
- 204.10%
- 3Y*
- 67.13%
- 5Y*
- 27.67%
- 10Y*
- -1.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLDW vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLDW vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank
GLDW
NUGT
GLDW vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDW | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | -0.33 | +1.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDW and NUGT is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GLDW vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison
GLDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.11%, more than NUGT's 0.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 12.11% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares | 0.29% | 0.22% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.57% |
Drawdowns
GLDW vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDW drawdown since its inception was -23.59%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW and NUGT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDW | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.59% | -99.97% | +76.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -96.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.66% | -99.76% | +83.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.11% | -91.43% | +86.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.61% | — |
Volatility
GLDW vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLDW | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 36.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 77.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.26% | 91.23% | -49.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.26% | 70.70% | -29.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.26% | 89.95% | -48.69% |