PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UP vs. ENTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UP vs. ENTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) and Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UP achieves a -45.22% return, which is significantly lower than ENTA's -29.80% return.


UP

1D
-0.14%
1M
19.63%
YTD
-45.22%
6M
-46.06%
1Y
-76.19%
3Y*
-47.68%
5Y*
-67.56%
10Y*

ENTA

1D
-1.86%
1M
-27.84%
YTD
-29.80%
6M
-21.93%
1Y
48.19%
3Y*
-24.76%
5Y*
-25.36%
10Y*
-7.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UP vs. ENTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UP
Wheels Up Experience Inc.
-45.22%-60.22%-51.90%-66.70%-77.80%-53.46%3.32%
ENTA
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-29.80%174.26%-38.89%-79.77%-37.79%77.62%-6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between UP and ENTA is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2020

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UP:

$259.91M

ENTA:

$319.83M

EPS

UP:

-$7.82

ENTA:

-$2.67

PS Ratio

UP:

0.35

ENTA:

3.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

UP:

$727.89M

ENTA:

$69.21M

Gross Profit (TTM)

UP:

$27.38M

ENTA:

$33.44M

EBITDA (TTM)

UP:

-$176.99M

ENTA:

-$61.85M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UP vs. ENTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UP
UP Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
UP Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
UP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
UP Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ENTA
ENTA Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ENTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENTA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ENTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENTA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UP vs. ENTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) and Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UPENTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.24

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

1.41

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

2.72

-3.88

UP vs. ENTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UP Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the ENTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UP and ENTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UPENTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

0.44

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.56

-0.35

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.55

-0.05

-0.50

Drawdowns

UP vs. ENTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UP drawdown since its inception was -99.78%, roughly equal to the maximum ENTA drawdown of -96.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UP and ENTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPENTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.78%

-96.63%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.39%

-34.30%

-58.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.63%

-83.61%

-12.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.78%

-95.62%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.69%

-91.24%

-8.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.90%

-49.23%

-29.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

65.66%

17.76%

+47.90%

Volatility

UP vs. ENTA - Volatility Comparison

Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) has a higher volatility of 43.67% compared to Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENTA) at 13.36%. This indicates that UP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPENTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.67%

13.36%

+30.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

98.57%

35.53%

+63.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

135.77%

109.93%

+25.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.12%

73.36%

+47.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

115.11%

60.70%

+54.41%

Dividends

UP vs. ENTA - Dividend Comparison

Neither UP nor ENTA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

UP vs. ENTA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wheels Up Experience Inc. and Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
168.92M
17.16M
(UP) Total Revenue
(ENTA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UP and ENTA have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UP has higher volatility (43.67%) compared to ENTA (13.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UP dropped -99.78% vs ENTA's -96.63%.

ENTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UP and ENTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer