PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENTA vs. SKYE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ENTA vs. SKYE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENTA) and Skye Bioscience, Inc (SKYE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENTA achieves a -20.10% return, which is significantly higher than SKYE's -24.17% return. Over the past 10 years, ENTA has outperformed SKYE with an annualized return of -5.43%, while SKYE has yielded a comparatively lower -41.81% annualized return.


ENTA

1D
-3.08%
1M
-16.61%
6M
-2.33%
YTD
-20.10%
1Y
77.22%
3Y*
-12.24%
5Y*
-21.49%
10Y*
-5.43%
ALL TIME*
-1.05%

SKYE

1D
-2.03%
1M
-18.84%
6M
-43.71%
YTD
-24.17%
1Y
-83.33%
3Y*
-52.63%
5Y*
-57.01%
10Y*
-41.81%
ALL TIME*
-49.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.83M$2.27M$2.92M
$68.55K$77.34K$111.60K

ENTA vs. SKYE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENTA
Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-20.10%174.26%-38.89%-79.77%-37.79%77.62%-31.85%-12.78%20.71%75.16%
SKYE
Skye Bioscience, Inc
-24.17%-73.51%4.04%-32.84%-68.85%30.00%-69.47%-67.25%163.16%-49.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ENTA and SKYE is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2015

0.06

The correlation between ENTA and SKYE shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ENTA:

$366.39M

SKYE:

$19.98M

EPS

ENTA:

-$2.60

SKYE:

-$1.45

PB Ratio

ENTA:

3.16

SKYE:

2.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

ENTA:

$69.21M

SKYE:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

ENTA:

$33.44M

SKYE:

-$180.01K

EBITDA (TTM)

ENTA:

-$61.85M

SKYE:

$10.92M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENTA vs. SKYE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ENTA
ENTA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ENTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENTA Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ENTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENTA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SKYE
SKYE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SKYE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKYE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKYE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
SKYE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKYE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ENTA vs. SKYE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENTA) and Skye Bioscience, Inc (SKYE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ENTASKYEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.80

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

-0.96

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.44

-1.15

+4.59

ENTA vs. SKYE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the SKYE Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENTA and SKYE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENTA vs. SKYE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENTA drawdown since its inception was -96.63%, roughly equal to the maximum SKYE drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENTA and SKYE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENTASKYEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.63%

-99.96%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.30%

-88.03%

+53.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.51%

-96.84%

+18.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.62%

-98.58%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.63%

-99.84%

+3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.03%

-99.96%

+9.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.66%

-94.98%

+45.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.35%

72.94%

-53.59%

Volatility

ENTA vs. SKYE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENTA) is 11.70%, while Skye Bioscience, Inc (SKYE) has a volatility of 14.37%. This indicates that ENTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SKYE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENTASKYEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.70%

14.37%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.43%

53.78%

-19.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

108.78%

103.06%

+5.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.65%

130.59%

-56.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.73%

136.04%

-75.31%

Dividends

ENTA vs. SKYE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENTA nor SKYE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ENTA vs. SKYE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Skye Bioscience, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ENTA and SKYE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SKYE has higher volatility (14.37%) compared to ENTA (11.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENTA dropped -96.63% vs SKYE's -99.96%.

ENTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENTA and SKYE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer