UOCT vs. NVDO
UOCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. UOCT is passively managed, while NVDO is actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
UOCT vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UOCT achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 16.35% return.
UOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 14.04%
- 3Y*
- 11.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 16.35%
- 6M
- 21.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UOCT vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October | 5.12% | 3.46% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 16.35% | 10.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between UOCT and NVDO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UOCT vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
UOCT
NVDO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UOCT vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October (UOCT) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UOCT | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UOCT vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UOCT drawdown since its inception was -13.68%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UOCT and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UOCT | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.68% | -16.25% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -4.73% | +4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -4.97% | +3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | — | — |
Volatility
UOCT vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UOCT | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.68% | 32.20% | -26.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.73% | 32.20% | -25.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.65% | 32.20% | -24.55% |
UOCT vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
UOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
UOCT vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
UOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 14.32% | 16.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UOCT and NVDO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UOCT.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.32%, compared with 0.00% for UOCT.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UOCT and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for UOCT and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer