UOCT vs. PSFD

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

UOCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October) and PSFD (Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UOCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while PSFD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pacer. UOCT is passively managed, while PSFD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, UOCT returned 8.22%/yr vs 11.59%/yr for PSFD. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSFD.

Performance

UOCT vs. PSFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October (UOCT) and Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UOCT achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than PSFD's 6.30% return.

UOCT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 5.12%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: 14.04%
• 3Y*: 11.35%
• 5Y*: 8.22%
• 10Y*: —

PSFD

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 6.30%
• 6M: 6.31%
• 1Y: 17.52%
• 3Y*: 14.36%
• 5Y*: 11.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UOCT vs. PSFD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
UOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October	5.12%	10.67%	8.98%	18.66%	-4.33%	5.83%	0.81%
PSFD Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF	6.30%	12.93%	14.54%	20.95%	-3.06%	18.23%	1.33%

Correlation

The correlation between UOCT and PSFD is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2020	0.86

The correlation between UOCT and PSFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

UOCT vs. PSFD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UOCT	PSFD
Technology	38.4%	39.0%
Financial Services	11.0%	11.1%
Communication Services	10.8%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	9.9%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.3%
Industrials	7.9%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.5%
Energy	3.2%	3.1%
Utilities	2.1%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

UOCT vs. PSFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UOCT

UOCT Risk / Return Rank: 80
UOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
UOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
UOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
UOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
UOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 83

PSFD

PSFD Risk / Return Rank: 79
PSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
PSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
PSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UOCT vs. PSFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October (UOCT) and Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UOCT	PSFD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	2.53	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	3.69	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.52	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	2.99	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.21	15.09	+1.11

UOCT vs. PSFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the PSFD Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UOCT and PSFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UOCT vs. PSFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UOCT drawdown since its inception was -13.68%, smaller than the maximum PSFD drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UOCT and PSFD.

Drawdown Indicators

	UOCT	PSFD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.68%	-14.94%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.24%	-5.88%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.21%	-12.26%	+3.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.21%	-14.94%	+5.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-0.37%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.52%	-2.00%	+0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.87%	1.16%	-0.29%

Volatility

UOCT vs. PSFD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October (UOCT) is 1.61%, while Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) has a volatility of 2.19%. This indicates that UOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UOCT	PSFD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.61%	2.19%	-0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.46%	5.95%	-1.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.68%	6.96%	-1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.73%	10.51%	-3.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.65%	10.42%	-2.77%

UOCT vs. PSFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

UOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PSFD's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

UOCT vs. PSFD - Dividend Comparison

Neither UOCT nor PSFD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PSFD Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UOCT and PSFD in my portfolio?

UOCT and PSFD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UOCT or PSFD?

PSFD has higher volatility (2.19%) compared to UOCT (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UOCT dropped -13.68% vs PSFD's -14.94%.

Which ETF is better, UOCT or PSFD?

On 5-year performance, PSFD leads with 11.59% vs 8.22% for UOCT. On fees, PSFD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UOCT or PSFD?

Over the 5-year period, PSFD has performed better with a 11.59% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UOCT or PSFD?

PSFD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UOCT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UOCT or PSFD?

UOCT and PSFD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between UOCT and PSFD?

UOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PSFD is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UOCT and 0.75% for PSFD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.