UNWPX vs. INIVX
Compare and contrast key facts about U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX).
UNWPX is managed by US Global. It was launched on Nov 26, 1985. INIVX is managed by VanEck. It was launched on Feb 9, 1956.
Performance
UNWPX vs. INIVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UNWPX vs. INIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | -40.12% | 136.32% | 2.07% | -16.18% | -32.95% | -13.88% | 70.83% | 22.59% | -31.49% | -3.82% |
INIVX VanEck International Investors Gold Fund | 14.16% | 165.88% | 14.37% | 9.67% | -13.77% | -14.23% | 40.91% | 38.15% | -16.01% | 13.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNWPX achieves a -40.12% return, which is significantly lower than INIVX's 14.16% return. Over the past 10 years, UNWPX has underperformed INIVX with an annualized return of 1.91%, while INIVX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.25% annualized return.
UNWPX
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -50.25%
- YTD
- -40.12%
- 6M
- -30.65%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- -6.00%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
INIVX
- 1D
- 4.17%
- 1M
- -9.57%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 6M
- 35.36%
- 1Y
- 126.12%
- 3Y*
- 51.11%
- 5Y*
- 26.71%
- 10Y*
- 19.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UNWPX vs. INIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNWPX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than INIVX's 1.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UNWPX vs. INIVX — Risk / Return Rank
UNWPX
INIVX
UNWPX vs. INIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNWPX | INIVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.29 | 2.75 | -2.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.69 | 2.84 | -2.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.44 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 4.24 | -3.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 15.81 | -13.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNWPX | INIVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | 2.75 | -2.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | 0.80 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 | 0.56 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.27 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between UNWPX and INIVX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UNWPX vs. INIVX - Dividend Comparison
UNWPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.94%, more than INIVX's 5.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | 9.94% | 5.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 71.74% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 17.45% | 28.55% | 0.33% | 9.84% |
INIVX VanEck International Investors Gold Fund | 5.27% | 6.01% | 7.45% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 6.40% | 11.70% | 3.66% | 2.87% | 3.76% | 6.40% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UNWPX vs. INIVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNWPX drawdown since its inception was -83.78%, which is greater than INIVX's maximum drawdown of -78.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNWPX and INIVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNWPX | INIVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.78% | -78.96% | -4.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.72% | -29.60% | -24.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.16% | -45.06% | -19.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | -51.20% | -17.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.26% | -16.22% | -50.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.58% | -37.84% | -11.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.59% | 7.94% | +0.65% |
Volatility
UNWPX vs. INIVX - Volatility Comparison
U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) has a higher volatility of 48.08% compared to VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX) at 16.38%. This indicates that UNWPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UNWPX | INIVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 48.08% | 16.38% | +31.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.60% | 38.64% | +18.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.56% | 45.87% | +8.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.30% | 33.67% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.29% | 34.21% | -1.92% |