PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEURX vs. FGADX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEURX vs. FGADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6 (FEURX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEURX achieves a -1.87% return, which is significantly lower than FGADX's -0.35% return.


FEURX

1D
-2.15%
1M
-4.15%
YTD
-1.87%
6M
-5.30%
1Y
51.82%
3Y*
35.87%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*

FGADX

1D
-2.43%
1M
-2.84%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
-3.21%
1Y
79.15%
3Y*
51.33%
5Y*
22.66%
10Y*
14.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEURX vs. FGADX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEURX
First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6
-1.87%129.09%10.69%7.37%-1.26%-7.42%30.08%38.92%-15.55%-1.36%
FGADX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class
-0.35%197.29%17.98%2.20%-23.24%-3.76%44.60%51.87%-17.89%-10.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FEURX and FGADX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2017

0.93

The correlation between FEURX and FGADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEURX vs. FGADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEURX
FEURX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FEURX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEURX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEURX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FEURX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEURX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FGADX
FGADX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FGADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGADX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FGADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGADX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEURX vs. FGADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6 (FEURX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEURXFGADXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.16

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

6.01

-1.71

FEURX vs. FGADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEURX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the FGADX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEURX and FGADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEURX vs. FGADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEURX drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, smaller than the maximum FGADX drawdown of -78.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEURX and FGADX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEURXFGADXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.99%

-78.57%

+41.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.34%

-34.73%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.34%

-34.73%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

-48.77%

+14.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.14%

-25.97%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.77%

-34.70%

+21.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.69%

12.49%

-0.80%

Volatility

FEURX vs. FGADX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6 (FEURX) is 13.56%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) has a volatility of 16.62%. This indicates that FEURX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEURXFGADXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.56%

16.62%

-3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.11%

37.78%

-3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.77%

44.21%

-4.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.11%

34.16%

-5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.20%

33.04%

-5.84%

FEURX vs. FGADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEURX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FGADX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEURX vs. FGADX - Dividend Comparison

FEURX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than FGADX's 9.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FEURX
First Eagle Gold Fund Class R6
1.28%1.26%5.39%1.17%0.00%1.30%1.53%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FGADX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class
9.85%9.81%12.51%3.09%0.00%8.83%10.06%0.00%0.00%0.62%8.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FEURX and FGADX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGADX has higher volatility (16.62%) compared to FEURX (13.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEURX dropped -36.99% vs FGADX's -78.57%.

FGADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEURX and FGADX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer