UNWPX vs. FEGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and First Eagle Gold Fund Class I (FEGIX).
UNWPX is managed by US Global. It was launched on Nov 26, 1985. FEGIX is managed by First Eagle. It was launched on Aug 31, 1993.
Performance
UNWPX vs. FEGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UNWPX vs. FEGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | -6.08% | 136.32% | 2.07% | -16.18% | -32.95% | -13.88% | 70.83% | 22.59% | -31.49% | -3.82% |
FEGIX First Eagle Gold Fund Class I | 2.63% | 128.89% | 10.57% | 7.24% | -1.31% | -7.54% | 30.00% | 38.98% | -15.69% | 8.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNWPX achieves a -6.08% return, which is significantly lower than FEGIX's 2.63% return. Over the past 10 years, UNWPX has underperformed FEGIX with an annualized return of 6.60%, while FEGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.86% annualized return.
UNWPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -25.00%
- YTD
- -6.08%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 81.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- 6.60%
FEGIX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -22.39%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 19.07%
- 1Y
- 78.51%
- 3Y*
- 35.94%
- 5Y*
- 22.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UNWPX vs. FEGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNWPX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FEGIX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UNWPX vs. FEGIX — Risk / Return Rank
UNWPX
FEGIX
UNWPX vs. FEGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) and First Eagle Gold Fund Class I (FEGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNWPX | FEGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | 2.07 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 2.33 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 2.97 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.24 | 11.00 | +0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNWPX | FEGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 2.07 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.82 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.59 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.34 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between UNWPX and FEGIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UNWPX vs. FEGIX - Dividend Comparison
UNWPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than FEGIX's 1.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | 6.34% | 5.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 71.74% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 17.45% | 28.55% | 0.33% | 9.84% |
FEGIX First Eagle Gold Fund Class I | 1.16% | 1.19% | 5.31% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UNWPX vs. FEGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNWPX drawdown since its inception was -83.78%, which is greater than FEGIX's maximum drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNWPX and FEGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNWPX | FEGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.78% | -70.38% | -13.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.02% | -26.66% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.16% | -33.95% | -30.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | -41.84% | -27.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.07% | -22.73% | -24.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.57% | -28.82% | -20.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.16% | 7.21% | -0.05% |
Volatility
UNWPX vs. FEGIX - Volatility Comparison
U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) has a higher volatility of 14.61% compared to First Eagle Gold Fund Class I (FEGIX) at 13.89%. This indicates that UNWPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UNWPX | FEGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.61% | 13.89% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.08% | 32.49% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.36% | 38.59% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.91% | 28.11% | +1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.01% | 27.16% | +2.85% |