PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNOV vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNOV vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNOV achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 8.39% return.


UNOV

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.17%
YTD
5.40%
6M
5.64%
1Y
13.88%
3Y*
10.20%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*

FDVV

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.44%
YTD
8.39%
6M
8.67%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNOV vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UNOV
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November
5.40%9.92%9.42%14.18%-6.23%4.45%8.31%1.87%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
8.39%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%5.60%

Correlation

The correlation between UNOV and FDVV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019

0.74

The correlation between UNOV and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

UNOV vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UNOV
FDVV

Technology

36.2%
29.1%

Financial Services

11.9%
17.0%

Communication Services

10.9%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
13.6%

Healthcare

8.4%
3.1%

Industrials

8.1%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
11.0%

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%
8.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
10.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

UNOV
36.2%
FDVV
29.1%

Financial Services

UNOV
11.9%
FDVV
17.0%

Communication Services

UNOV
10.9%
FDVV
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

UNOV
10.1%
FDVV
13.6%

Healthcare

UNOV
8.4%
FDVV
3.1%

Industrials

UNOV
8.1%
FDVV
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

UNOV
4.9%
FDVV
11.0%

Energy

UNOV
3.5%
FDVV

-

Utilities

UNOV
2.3%
FDVV
8.7%

Real Estate

UNOV
1.9%
FDVV
10.1%

Basic Materials

UNOV
1.8%
FDVV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNOV vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNOV
UNOV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNOV vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UNOVFDVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.43

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.53

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.01

10.54

+4.48

UNOV vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNOV and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UNOVFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.35

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.91

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.79

+0.12

Drawdowns

UNOV vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNOV drawdown since its inception was -13.84%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNOV and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNOVFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.84%

-40.25%

+26.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.52%

-9.30%

+4.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

-15.90%

+6.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.10%

-20.18%

+11.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-1.12%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.66%

-3.81%

+2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

2.23%

-1.30%

Volatility

UNOV vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) is 1.14%, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that UNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNOVFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

3.14%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.67%

7.99%

-3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.58%

10.06%

-4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.83%

14.75%

-7.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.72%

17.00%

-9.28%

UNOV vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

UNOV vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

UNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.72%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%
UNOV
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UNOV and FDVV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDVV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to UNOV (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNOV dropped -13.84% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.36% vs 6.68% for UNOV. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, UNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UNOV.

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.00% for UNOV.

UNOV tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UNOV and 0.29% for FDVV.

UNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNOV and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer