UNOV vs. AFOS
UNOV (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UNOV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
UNOV vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNOV achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.
UNOV
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 5.64%
- 1Y
- 13.88%
- 3Y*
- 10.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.94%
- YTD
- 32.04%
- 6M
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNOV vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November | 5.40% | 6.06% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 32.04% | 36.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNOV and AFOS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNOV vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
UNOV
AFOS
UNOV vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNOV | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.01 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNOV | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 4.35 | -3.43 |
Drawdowns
UNOV vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNOV drawdown since its inception was -13.84%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNOV and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNOV | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.84% | -11.52% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.29% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -1.37% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | — | — |
Volatility
UNOV vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNOV | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.58% | 20.19% | -14.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.83% | 20.19% | -13.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.72% | 20.19% | -12.47% |
UNOV vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNOV vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
UNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% |
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNOV and AFOS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UNOV.
AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.00% for UNOV.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UNOV and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for UNOV and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer