UNHW vs. LINT
UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNHW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
UNHW vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNHW achieves a 22.06% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 549.02% return.
UNHW
- 1D
- 6.07%
- 1M
- 10.36%
- YTD
- 22.06%
- 6M
- 20.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LINT
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 549.02%
- 6M
- 433.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNHW vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 22.06% | -3.02% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 549.02% | -30.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNHW and LINT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.18 |
UNHW vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UNHW
LINT
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
UNHW
LINT
-
Basic Materials
UNHW
-
LINT
-
Communication Services
UNHW
-
LINT
-
Consumer Cyclical
UNHW
-
LINT
-
Consumer Defensive
UNHW
-
LINT
-
Energy
UNHW
-
LINT
-
Financial Services
UNHW
-
LINT
-
Industrials
UNHW
-
LINT
-
Real Estate
UNHW
-
LINT
-
Technology
UNHW
-
LINT
Utilities
UNHW
-
LINT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNHW vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNHW | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 22.52 | -21.71 |
Drawdowns
UNHW vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNHW drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHW and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNHW | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.28% | -49.54% | +17.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -28.08% | +26.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.40% | -20.57% | +8.17% |
Volatility
UNHW vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNHW | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.32% | 162.52% | -112.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.32% | 162.52% | -112.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.32% | 162.52% | -112.20% |
UNHW vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNHW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNHW vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
UNHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.34%, more than LINT's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.13% | 0.25% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 16.34% | 2.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNHW and LINT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.
UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 16.34%, compared with 0.13% for LINT.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UNHW and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for UNHW and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer