UNHW vs. ARMG
UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNHW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.
Performance
UNHW vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNHW achieves a 22.06% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 841.05% return.
UNHW
- 1D
- 6.07%
- 1M
- 10.36%
- YTD
- 22.06%
- 6M
- 20.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMG
- 1D
- -9.19%
- 1M
- 211.14%
- YTD
- 841.05%
- 6M
- 460.44%
- 1Y
- 443.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNHW vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 22.06% | -3.02% |
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 841.05% | -39.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNHW and ARMG is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNHW vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank
UNHW
ARMG
UNHW vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNHW | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 1.10 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
UNHW vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNHW drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHW and ARMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNHW | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.28% | -80.28% | +48.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -68.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -9.19% | +7.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.40% | -52.91% | +40.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 38.55% | — |
Volatility
UNHW vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNHW | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 66.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 104.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.32% | 130.67% | -80.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.32% | 138.36% | -88.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.32% | 138.36% | -88.04% |
UNHW vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNHW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNHW vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison
UNHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.34%, more than ARMG's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 0.52% | 4.86% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 16.34% | 2.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNHW and ARMG have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.
UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 16.34%, compared with 0.52% for ARMG.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UNHW and 0.75% for ARMG.
Find the right allocation for UNHW and ARMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer