UNHU vs. SOXS
UNHU (Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF) and SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - UNHU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while SOXS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). UNHU is actively managed, while SOXS is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. UNHU charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SOXS.
Performance
UNHU vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UNHU
- 1D
- 10.16%
- 1M
- 17.42%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXS
- 1D
- 5.91%
- 1M
- -54.82%
- YTD
- -91.63%
- 6M
- -91.49%
- 1Y
- -97.52%
- 3Y*
- -86.60%
- 5Y*
- -79.43%
- 10Y*
- -78.82%
UNHU vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF | 105.67% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | -85.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNHU and SOXS is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNHU vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank
UNHU
SOXS
UNHU vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNHU | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 57.76 | -0.79 | +58.55 |
Drawdowns
UNHU vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNHU drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHU and SOXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNHU | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.68% | -100.00% | +88.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -97.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -99.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -100.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -100.00% | +97.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -92.61% | +89.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 68.11% | — |
Volatility
UNHU vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNHU | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 44.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 84.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.61% | 102.19% | -32.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.61% | 108.21% | -38.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.61% | 100.48% | -30.87% |
UNHU vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNHU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNHU vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison
UNHU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 64.53% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% |
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNHU and SOXS have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UNHU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UNHU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.
SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 64.53%, compared with 0.00% for UNHU.
UNHU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SOXS is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for UNHU and 1.08% for SOXS.
Find the right allocation for UNHU and SOXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer