UNHU vs. IBMO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UNHU (Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF) and IBMO (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UNHU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while IBMO is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2026 Index. UNHU is actively managed, while IBMO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. UNHU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMO.

Performance

UNHU vs. IBMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

UNHU

• 1D: 10.16%
• 1M: 17.42%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBMO

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 0.95%
• 6M: 1.30%
• 1Y: 2.78%
• 3Y*: 2.93%
• 5Y*: 0.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNHU vs. IBMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF	105.67%
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between UNHU and IBMO is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026	-0.18

Return for Risk

UNHU vs. IBMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMO

IBMO Risk / Return Rank: 88
IBMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
IBMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
IBMO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
IBMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
IBMO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNHU vs. IBMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UNHU	IBMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	57.76	0.41	+57.35

Drawdowns

UNHU vs. IBMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNHU drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum IBMO drawdown of -14.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHU and IBMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	UNHU	IBMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.68%	-14.77%	+3.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.38%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-8.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.71%	0.00%	-2.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.99%	-2.32%	-0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UNHU	IBMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.83%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.61%	1.10%	+68.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.61%	2.15%	+67.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.61%	4.52%	+65.09%

UNHU vs. IBMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNHU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMO's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

UNHU vs. IBMO - Dividend Comparison

UNHU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF	2.39%	2.37%	2.15%	1.65%	0.89%	0.62%	1.03%	1.01%
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UNHU and IBMO in my portfolio?

UNHU and IBMO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UNHU or IBMO?

On fees, IBMO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UNHU or IBMO?

IBMO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UNHU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UNHU or IBMO?

IBMO has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.00% for UNHU.

What is the main difference between UNHU and IBMO?

UNHU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBMO is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for UNHU and 0.18% for IBMO.