PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBMO vs. FNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBMO vs. FNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO) and Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBMO achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than FNF's -12.12% return.


IBMO

1D
0.04%
1M
0.17%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.02%
1Y
2.58%
3Y*
2.79%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*

FNF

1D
0.26%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
-12.12%
6M
-12.96%
1Y
-7.13%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBMO vs. FNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBMO
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF
1.01%3.11%1.97%2.90%-5.36%-0.16%5.48%4.69%
FNF
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
-12.12%4.35%14.02%42.18%-21.64%38.04%-10.34%23.55%

Correlation

The correlation between IBMO and FNF is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2019

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBMO vs. FNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMO
IBMO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IBMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IBMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBMO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FNF
FNF Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNF Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNF Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBMO vs. FNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO) and Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBMOFNFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

0.97

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.84

-0.29

+7.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.33

-0.71

+21.04

IBMO vs. FNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the FNF Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBMO and FNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBMO vs. FNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMO drawdown since its inception was -14.77%, smaller than the maximum FNF drawdown of -72.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMO and FNF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBMOFNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.77%

-72.49%

+57.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.38%

-24.43%

+24.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.76%

-30.06%

+28.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.86%

-36.69%

+27.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-23.28%

+23.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-17.13%

+14.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.13%

10.00%

-9.87%

Volatility

IBMO vs. FNF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO) is 0.22%, while Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that IBMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBMOFNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

5.55%

-5.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.79%

19.24%

-18.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10%

25.90%

-24.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.14%

26.01%

-23.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

28.13%

-23.63%

Dividends

IBMO vs. FNF - Dividend Comparison

IBMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than FNF's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNF
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
4.35%3.60%3.46%3.59%4.57%2.99%3.45%2.78%3.82%37.01%2.59%2.31%
IBMO
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF
2.39%2.37%2.15%1.65%0.89%0.62%1.03%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBMO and FNF have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNF has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to IBMO (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBMO dropped -14.77% vs FNF's -72.49%.

IBMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBMO and FNF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer