PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNHG vs. 3NIE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNHG vs. 3NIE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNHG achieves a 24.66% return, which is significantly higher than 3NIE.L's -29.41% return.


UNHG

1D
10.27%
1M
16.80%
YTD
24.66%
6M
22.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

3NIE.L

1D
-2.04%
1M
-22.58%
YTD
-29.41%
6M
-14.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNHG vs. 3NIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UNHG and 3NIE.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNHG vs. 3NIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UNHG vs. 3NIE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UNHG3NIE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

-0.39

+1.13

Drawdowns

UNHG vs. 3NIE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNHG drawdown since its inception was -57.00%, smaller than the maximum 3NIE.L drawdown of -60.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHG and 3NIE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNHG3NIE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.00%

-60.65%

+3.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

-49.83%

+45.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.61%

-36.22%

+13.61%

Volatility

UNHG vs. 3NIE.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNHG3NIE.LDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.76%

175.21%

-92.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.76%

175.21%

-92.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.76%

175.21%

-92.45%

UNHG vs. 3NIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UNHG and 3NIE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

UNHG vs. 3NIE.L - Dividend Comparison

UNHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.07%, while 3NIE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


UNHG and 3NIE.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UNHG and 3NIE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNHG and 3NIE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer