PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNHG vs. 3QQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNHG vs. 3QQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNHG achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly lower than 3QQQ.L's 58.70% return.


UNHG

1D
-1.09%
1M
3.36%
YTD
13.58%
6M
17.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

3QQQ.L

1D
1.23%
1M
33.83%
YTD
58.70%
6M
53.26%
1Y
137.07%
3Y*
58.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNHG vs. 3QQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UNHG and 3QQQ.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNHG vs. 3QQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNHG

3QQQ.L
3QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNHG vs. 3QQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UNHG vs. 3QQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UNHG3QQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.60

-0.04

Drawdowns

UNHG vs. 3QQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNHG drawdown since its inception was -57.00%, roughly equal to the maximum 3QQQ.L drawdown of -58.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHG and 3QQQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNHG3QQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.00%

-58.93%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.39%

0.00%

-12.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.74%

-20.63%

-2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.48%

Volatility

UNHG vs. 3QQQ.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNHG3QQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.44%

63.11%

+19.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.44%

63.52%

+18.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.44%

63.52%

+18.92%

UNHG vs. 3QQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNHG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than 3QQQ.L's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

UNHG vs. 3QQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

UNHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.95%, while 3QQQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


UNHG and 3QQQ.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 3QQQ.L is cheaper at 0.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3QQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.01% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UNHG.

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UNHG and 0.01% for 3QQQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNHG and 3QQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer