UNH vs. VRT
UNH (UnitedHealth Group Incorporated) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. UNH operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, UNH returned 2.00%/yr vs 62.98%/yr for VRT. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UNH vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNH achieves a 24.12% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 85.57% return.
UNH
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 7.00%
- YTD
- 24.12%
- 6M
- 26.61%
- 1Y
- 37.87%
- 3Y*
- -4.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.00%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
VRT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -11.59%
- YTD
- 85.57%
- 6M
- 61.97%
- 1Y
- 160.87%
- 3Y*
- 142.34%
- 5Y*
- 62.98%
- 10Y*
- —
UNH vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 24.12% | -33.14% | -2.41% | 0.80% | 6.94% | 45.20% | 21.25% | 20.00% | -1.21% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 85.57% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNH and VRT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2018 | 0.09 |
The correlation between UNH and VRT shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (3 years) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UNH:
$369.98B
VRT:
$117.86B
UNH:
$13.23
VRT:
$3.99
UNH:
30.74
VRT:
75.41
UNH:
0.82
VRT:
10.84
UNH:
3.56
VRT:
27.77
UNH:
$449.71B
VRT:
$10.84B
UNH:
$84.55B
VRT:
$3.92B
UNH:
$22.99B
VRT:
$2.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNH vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
UNH
VRT
UNH vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNH | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.41 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 6.53 | -5.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | 18.20 | -15.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNH | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 2.79 | -1.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 1.03 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.00 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
UNH vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNH drawdown since its inception was -74.37%, roughly equal to the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNH and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNH | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.37% | -71.24% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.96% | -24.78% | -4.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.39% | -61.28% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.39% | -71.24% | +9.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.60% | -20.11% | -12.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -16.22% | +1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.19% | 8.89% | +4.30% |
Volatility
UNH vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) is 8.29%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that UNH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNH | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.29% | 16.60% | -8.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.87% | 45.55% | -14.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.17% | 58.11% | -17.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.87% | 61.81% | -29.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.19% | 54.61% | -24.42% |
Dividends
UNH vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
UNH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than VRT's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 2.17% | 2.64% | 1.62% | 1.38% | 1.21% | 1.12% | 1.38% | 1.41% | 1.38% | 1.30% | 1.48% | 1.59% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
UNH vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UNH vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison
UNH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated reported a gross profit of 25.41B and revenue of 111.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.7%.
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
UNH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated reported an operating income of 8.99B and revenue of 111.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
UNH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated reported a net income of 6.28B and revenue of 111.72B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UNH and VRT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRT has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to UNH (8.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNH dropped -74.37% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UNH and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer